Comparison Overview

Coldwell Banker

VS

JLL

Coldwell Banker

175 Park Ave, Madison, NJ, 07940, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC, a company founded in 1906 on a commitment to professionalism and customer service which remains the cornerstone of our business philosophy today. We are the nation’s oldest real estate company and our experience has helped make the dream of homeownership a reality for millions of families. Whether you are a first-time buyer or in the process of stepping up to your dream home, coldwellbanker.com is a great place to begin the process. We have made everything available to you 24/7 and only a click away - including information on properties for sale and access to the most professional sales agents in the business. Coldwell Banker affiliated real estate agents are the reason clients continue to work with us, transaction after transaction. Their knowledge and experience can guide you through the real estate process and help you with all of the details before, during and after the sale. Coldwell Banker is an Anywhere (NYSE: HOUS) brand.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41,563
Subsidiaries: 42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JLL

200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 60601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We’re a leading professional services firm that specializes in real estate and investment management. JLL shapes the future of real estate for a better world by using the most advanced technology to create rewarding opportunities, amazing spaces and sustainable real estate solutions for our clients, our people and our communities. We want the most ambitious clients to work with us, and the most ambitious people to work for us. Join us.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 94,439
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coldwell-banker.jpeg
Coldwell Banker
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jll.jpeg
JLL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coldwell Banker
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JLL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coldwell Banker in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JLL in 2025.

Incident History — Coldwell Banker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coldwell Banker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JLL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coldwell-banker.jpeg
Coldwell Banker
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jll.jpeg
JLL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JLL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coldwell Banker company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JLL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coldwell Banker company.

In the current year, JLL company and Coldwell Banker company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JLL company nor Coldwell Banker company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JLL company nor Coldwell Banker company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JLL company nor Coldwell Banker company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coldwell Banker company nor JLL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Coldwell Banker company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JLL company.

JLL company employs more people globally than Coldwell Banker company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coldwell Banker nor JLL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X