Comparison Overview

Colby College Museum of Art

VS

Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill

Colby College Museum of Art

5600 Mayflower Hill, None, Waterville, Maine, US, 04901
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Colby College Museum of Art is a teaching museum, a destination for American art, and a place for education and engagement with local, national, and global communities. Part of Colby College, the museum is located in Waterville, Maine, and actively contributes to Colby’s curricular and co-curricular programs and to the region’s quality of life. It inspires connections between art and people through distinctive exhibitions, programs, and publications and through an outstanding collection that emphasizes American art and contemporary art within holdings that span cultures and time periods. The Colby Museum actively seeks to increase diversity, equity, inclusion, and access across all of its work and to advocate for the community value of art, artists, and museums in engaging with today’s most vital questions.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill

101 S. Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Free to the public, the Ackland Art Museum at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is home to North Carolina’s premier collections of Asian art and works on paper (drawings, prints, and photographs) as well as significant collections of European masterworks, twentieth-century and contemporary art, African art, and North Carolina Pottery – in total, over 17,000 works of art representing over 4,500 years of human creativity. The Ackland’s new initiatives in collecting and exhibiting contemporary and American art are enriching our collection and its interpretation. As an academic unit of UNC-Chapel Hill, the Ackland serves as a center for research, scholarship, and creativity and is a resource for a diverse community of undergraduate, graduate, and professional students as they become the next generation of leaders. To that end, the Ackland offers varied and innovative programs that engage university students, faculty, and staff. In addition, the Ackland’s Study Gallery, funded in part by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, provides a dynamic space to exhibit art installed specifically for use by university classes of all disciplines. But supporting the University is only a part of the Museum’s mission; the Ackland collects, preserves, and presents great art to educate, inspire, and engage not only the University but also its regional, national, and international audiences in free and open inquiry. Every year, the Ackland presents more than a dozen exhibitions and offers over 200 events and programs designed for K-12 students, school-aged children, and the general public. An active participant within the creative community of North Carolina’s Research Triangle Park, the Ackland is proud to serve as a catalyst for the region’s economic and cultural development. Keep up with Museum news and events: http://ackland.org https://www.facebook.com/AcklandArtMuseum https://twitter.com/AcklandArt http://www.flickr.com/photos/acklandphotography

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colby-college-museum-of-art.jpeg
Colby College Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ackland-art-museum.jpeg
Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colby College Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colby College Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill in 2026.

Incident History — Colby College Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colby College Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colby-college-museum-of-art.jpeg
Colby College Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ackland-art-museum.jpeg
Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Colby College Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colby College Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company and Colby College Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company nor Colby College Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company nor Colby College Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company nor Colby College Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art company nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art company nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colby College Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colby College Museum of Art nor Ackland Art Museum, UNC-Chapel Hill holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N