Comparison Overview

COLAS

VS

REXEL USA

COLAS

Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Colas Group is a global leader in the construction and maintenance of transport infrastructure. Our mission is to design, build and maintain sustainable transport infrastructure from our local roots, around the world 🌍 Our three main activities are roads (our core business), materials and railways. Colas in numbers… 📍 50 countries across 5 continents 👷‍♀️👷‍♂️ about 58,000 employees 🚧 60,000 projects ♻ 3,000 materials production and recycling units 🚀 15.5 billion euros in revenue in 2022 Colas’ eight CSR commitments have been formalized in the ACT corporate project (Act and Commit Together), to respond to the expectations of its customers, employees, partners, users, investors and, more generally speaking, civil society as a whole. At Colas, we believe that it’s our people that drive our company forward. We strive to develop talent, and we give those who join the company the opportunity to reach their full potential throughout their careers. Because, when you join Colas, we hope you’ll make a career here.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 18,264
Subsidiaries: 119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

REXEL USA

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

REXEL, LEADING DISTRIBUTOR WORLDWIDE OF ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Rexel, a global leader in the distribution of electrical supplies and services, serves three main end markets: industrial, commercial and residential. The Group operates in 38 countries, with a network of some 2,200 branches, a distribution network of more than 40 banners and employs over 30,000 people. Rexel's sales were €13.1 billion in 2014. For more information, visit Rexel's web site at www.rexel.com. Rexel's ability to offer its customers innovative services ensures that it remains one step ahead as the uncontested leader in its markets. Rexel was listed on the Paris stock exchange until 2005 as a subsidiary of the PPR group and has since been owned by a private equity consortium led by Clayton Dubillier & Rice, Eurazeo and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity. Rexel returned to the Paris stock exchange through an IPO in April 2007. For construction, renovation and maintenance projects, Rexel supplies three profitable markets: Industrial: systems integrators, equipment manufacturers, production sites. To better serve its customers, Rexel has developed specialized banners all over the world. Commercial: shopping centers, sports facilities, hospitals, airports. Rexel also supplies to generalist and specialized contractors who equip these different sectors. Residential: climate control, security, home automation etc. The product offer and quality of services proposed by Rexel are decisive commercial advantages.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colas.jpeg
COLAS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rexel-usa.jpeg
REXEL USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
COLAS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
REXEL USA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REXEL USA in 2025.

Incident History — COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — REXEL USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REXEL USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colas.jpeg
COLAS
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rexel-usa.jpeg
REXEL USA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

COLAS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to REXEL USA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

COLAS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas REXEL USA company has not reported any.

In the current year, COLAS company has reported more cyber incidents than REXEL USA company.

Neither REXEL USA company nor COLAS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

COLAS company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other REXEL USA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

COLAS company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while REXEL USA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither COLAS company nor REXEL USA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

COLAS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to REXEL USA company.

COLAS company employs more people globally than REXEL USA company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither COLAS nor REXEL USA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H