Comparison Overview

Cohen Veterans Network

VS

MedCircle

Cohen Veterans Network

72 Cummings Point Road, Stamford, 06902, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Veteran and military families carried the weight of serving our country. We serve them with care they deserve. Cohen Veterans Network provides high-quality, accessible, and comprehensive mental health care to veterans and their families. Our client-centered, outpatient care aims to support veterans, service members, and their families as they begin their next mission: healthy and happy lives. Through our national network of Steven A. Cohen Military Family Clinics, veterans and their families are eligible for personalized, and evidence-based mental health care along with comprehensive case management support to deal with other stresses like unemployment, finances, housing, and legal issues. Our skilled staff has experience working with veterans, service members, and their families.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MedCircle

6790 Embarcadero Ln, Carlsbad, California, 92011, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

MedCircle is the most credentialed preventative mental health care company - delivering a comprehensive mental health care solution for your business. MedCircle’s award-winning video library gives you “behind-the-scenes” insight from the most sought-after psychologists and psychiatrists. You’ll learn what certain diagnoses entail and get unprecedented insight into the processes experienced doctors use to diagnose them. You’ll also understand treatment options, the risks and benefits each doctor considers, and how they prescribe a treatment, therapy and/or medication. Workshops give you direct access to the MedCircle doctors. Attend weekly Workshops (or watch the recording) to learn new strategies and insight to help you navigate today’s world. Submit your questions and get answers from psychologists, psychiatrists, and specialists. Learn more at medcircle.com/work

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cohenveterans.jpeg
Cohen Veterans Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medcircledigest.jpeg
MedCircle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cohen Veterans Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MedCircle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cohen Veterans Network in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MedCircle in 2026.

Incident History — Cohen Veterans Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cohen Veterans Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MedCircle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MedCircle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cohenveterans.jpeg
Cohen Veterans Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medcircledigest.jpeg
MedCircle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cohen Veterans Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MedCircle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MedCircle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cohen Veterans Network company.

In the current year, MedCircle company and Cohen Veterans Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MedCircle company nor Cohen Veterans Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MedCircle company nor Cohen Veterans Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MedCircle company nor Cohen Veterans Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network company nor MedCircle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network company nor MedCircle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cohen Veterans Network company employs more people globally than MedCircle company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cohen Veterans Network nor MedCircle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N