Comparison Overview

Cohen Highley LLP

VS

HCMC Legal, Inc.

Cohen Highley LLP

undefined, Serving Southwestern Ontario, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in London ON in 1974, Cohen Highley, opened its seventh branch office in Windsor ON in 2023. The firm prides itself on accessibility, innovation, and professionalism, and offers full legal services at all office locations that include- in addition to London and Windsor- Kitchener, Strathroy, Sarnia, and Stratford. Cohen Highley’s legal team delivers progressive, practical, and effective legal solutions, by holding themselves accountable for the quality of their work on every file and for every client. Cohen Highley is committed to meeting the needs of our clients, while acting fairly, firmly, and with integrity.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HCMC Legal, Inc.

360 Lexington Ave, New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

HCMC Legal, Inc., the parent company of Hire Counsel and Mestel & Company, is a national company exclusively dedicated to legal placement, temporary staffing, document review management and related services. Hire Counsel, founded in 1993, is a leading innovative services provider to law firms, corporations and government agencies for today’s new legal economy. We help our diversified clients manage dynamic workloads and distinct legal needs to achieve consistently superior results more profitably. Mestel & Company, founded in 1987, is a leader in legal search and recruitment consulting with a prominent legacy and a forward-looking vision. We excel in the advancement of careers for individual associates, of counsel, partners, in-house counsel as well as facilitate the movement of groups and complex law firm mergers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cohen-highley-llp.jpeg
Cohen Highley LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcmc-legal.jpeg
HCMC Legal, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cohen Highley LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HCMC Legal, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cohen Highley LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCMC Legal, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Cohen Highley LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cohen Highley LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HCMC Legal, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCMC Legal, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cohen-highley-llp.jpeg
Cohen Highley LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcmc-legal.jpeg
HCMC Legal, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cohen Highley LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HCMC Legal, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HCMC Legal, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cohen Highley LLP company.

In the current year, HCMC Legal, Inc. company and Cohen Highley LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HCMC Legal, Inc. company nor Cohen Highley LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HCMC Legal, Inc. company nor Cohen Highley LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HCMC Legal, Inc. company nor Cohen Highley LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP company nor HCMC Legal, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP company nor HCMC Legal, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cohen Highley LLP company employs more people globally than HCMC Legal, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cohen Highley LLP nor HCMC Legal, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X