Comparison Overview

Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants

VS

De Jutters

Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants

320 Central Park West, New York, 10025, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants of Westchester and Manhattan is a private group practice of internationally recognized mental health professionals who specialize in Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and provide the highest quality of clinical, consultation, and coaching services. Through the use of evidence-based approaches, we provide the necessary structure and tools to assist individuals with issues ranging from life stresses and problems to the full range of mild to severe psychological disorders. We serve adults, adolescents, children, couples and families, as well as provide consultation to the community and other professionals.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

De Jutters

Postbus 61452, Den Haag, 2506 AL, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

De Jutters diagnosticeert en behandelt kinderen, jongeren en jongvolwassenen met psychische klachten. Ons doel: een optimale ontwikkeling van de jongere, om een zo gewoon mogelijk leven te kunnen leiden. Dat doen we dichtbij thuis en samen met de jongere en zijn familie, omdat we weten dat het essentieel is om de persoonlijke omgeving bij de behandeling te betrekken. Om de kwaliteit van onze zorg te garanderen, baseren wij ons op wetenschappelijk onderzoek, jarenlange praktijkervaring en de kennis en ervaring van cliënten. We bieden bovendien complete zorg en houden tijdens de behandeling intensief contact met de school, huisarts en andere (jeugd)zorginstellingen. Zo kunnen we altijd zorg op maat bieden, en werken we samen met de cliënt naar een toekomst op eigen kracht.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognitive-&-behavioral-consultants.jpeg
Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-jutters.jpeg
De Jutters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
De Jutters
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for De Jutters in 2026.

Incident History — Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — De Jutters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

De Jutters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognitive-&-behavioral-consultants.jpeg
Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-jutters.jpeg
De Jutters
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company and De Jutters company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, De Jutters company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company.

In the current year, De Jutters company and Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither De Jutters company nor Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither De Jutters company nor Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither De Jutters company nor Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company nor De Jutters company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company nor De Jutters company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

De Jutters company employs more people globally than Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cognitive & Behavioral Consultants nor De Jutters holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H