Comparison Overview

Cogar Printing

VS

Omnipress

Cogar Printing

1515 Martin Boulevard, Middle River, MD, 21220, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Cogar Printing was founded in 1982 by Randy Cogar. He began this entrepreneurial venture with 16 years of prior experience in the printing industry. His vision was to help market small area businesses by providing innovative ideas and quality printing. Since then things have continued to grow and a second generation of leadership is in place supporting and enhancing the ideas upon which the company was founded. In 2020, Randy Cogar’s son Todd Cogar took leadership of the business. He is dedicated to continuing his father’s vision by expanding all the services Cogar Printing provides to small and larger businesses alike.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Omnipress

2600 Anderson St, Madison, Wisconsin, 53704, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We help you deliver education. For over 45 years, Omnipress has helped associations, corporations, non-profits, and other organizations collect, produce, and deliver print and digital educational content for conferences, training courses, and member publications. Our technology and print solutions include: - CATALYST abstract management platform - Mobile event app - Online event program - Printed booklets, manuals, and workbooks - Warehousing and fulfillment services - Digital publications We would love to work with you too! (800) 828-0305 [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogar-print-and-graphic-solutions.jpeg
Cogar Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omnipress.jpeg
Omnipress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cogar Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Omnipress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cogar Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omnipress in 2025.

Incident History — Cogar Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cogar Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Omnipress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omnipress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogar-print-and-graphic-solutions.jpeg
Cogar Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omnipress.jpeg
Omnipress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cogar Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Omnipress company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Omnipress company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cogar Printing company.

In the current year, Omnipress company and Cogar Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Omnipress company nor Cogar Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Omnipress company nor Cogar Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Omnipress company nor Cogar Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cogar Printing company nor Omnipress company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cogar Printing company nor Omnipress company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Omnipress company employs more people globally than Cogar Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cogar Printing nor Omnipress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N