Comparison Overview

Coffey Burlington

VS

Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors

Coffey Burlington

2601 S Bayshore Dr, Miami, Florida, 33133, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

For more than 35 years our lawyers have provided superior service to a diverse multitude of individuals and businesses. Our representative clients include Fortune 500 companies, banks and financial institutions, broker-dealers, developers, investors, contractors, law firms, accounting firms, and governments. We are proud that many of the country’s premier law firms refer their clients to us when conflicts of interest affect their ability to serve as counsel. The firm's attorneys share a commitment to providing exceptionally responsive and proactive service to our clients. Our focused and individualized attention to our clients is matched by our steadfast commitment to community service, philanthropy, and pro bono work.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors

29 Billing Road, Northampton, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We have a diverse team of lawyers who are of varying qualification and experience providing expert legal services for both individual clients and businesses, tailored to their specific needs. We are equally able to advise and assist individuals as to the issues that matter to them; family, their future, moving home and their work as we are for our commercial clients who are expanding or retracting their business, selling, merging, facing property issues, disputes or have problems with employees.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coffey-burlington.jpeg
Coffey Burlington
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borneo-martell-turner-coulston.jpeg
Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coffey Burlington
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coffey Burlington in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Coffey Burlington (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coffey Burlington cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coffey-burlington.jpeg
Coffey Burlington
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borneo-martell-turner-coulston.jpeg
Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coffey Burlington company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coffey Burlington company.

In the current year, Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company and Coffey Burlington company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company nor Coffey Burlington company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company nor Coffey Burlington company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company nor Coffey Burlington company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coffey Burlington company nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coffey Burlington company nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Coffey Burlington company employs more people globally than Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coffey Burlington nor Borneo Martell Turner Coulston Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X