Comparison Overview

CodeTwo

VS

Tata Elxsi

CodeTwo

Last Update: 2024-06-29 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

CodeTwo develops software solutions for Microsoft 365, Exchange Server and Outlook. We focus mainly on email signature & branding management, mailbox migration and backup. Since 2007, CodeTwo solutions have been used by 120,000+ companies in 170+ countries. Our flagship products have been critically acclaimed and mentioned by Gartner, Newsweek and Forbes. We are Microsoft Gold Partner and we won Microsoft Partner of the Year Award in the ISV category and were named Microsoft Customer Experience Award Finalist.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tata Elxsi

ITBP Road Whitefield Bangalore, Karnataka 560 048, IN
Last Update: 2025-04-24 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Tata Elxsi is amongst the worldโ€™s leading providers of design and technology services across industries, including Automotive, Broadcast, Communications, and Healthcare. Tata Elxsi is helping customers reimagine their products and services through design thinking and the application of digital technologies such as IoT (Internet of Things), Cloud, Mobility, Virtual Reality, and Artificial Intelligence. Tata Elxsi is truly home to a billion possibilities. We believe in opportunities for everyone - to be bold, and curious and seek to shape the future. Explore whatโ€™s possible, discover what you love to do, and find accelerated paths for growth. At Tata Elxsi, you matter.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codetwo.jpeg
CodeTwo
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
CodeTwo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Elxsi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CodeTwo in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi in 2025.

Incident History โ€” CodeTwo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CodeTwo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Tata Elxsi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Elxsi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codetwo.jpeg
CodeTwo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both CodeTwo company and Tata Elxsi company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Tata Elxsi company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CodeTwo company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Elxsi company has reported more cyber incidents than CodeTwo company.

Tata Elxsi company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CodeTwo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CodeTwo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CodeTwo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CodeTwo company nor Tata Elxsi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CodeTwo company.

CodeTwo company employs more people globally than Tata Elxsi company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X