Comparison Overview

CodeTwo

VS

LexisNexis

CodeTwo

Last Update: 2024-06-29 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

CodeTwo develops software solutions for Microsoft 365, Exchange Server and Outlook. We focus mainly on email signature & branding management, mailbox migration and backup. Since 2007, CodeTwo solutions have been used by 120,000+ companies in 170+ countries. Our flagship products have been critically acclaimed and mentioned by Gartner, Newsweek and Forbes. We are Microsoft Gold Partner and we won Microsoft Partner of the Year Award in the ISV category and were named Microsoft Customer Experience Award Finalist.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LexisNexis

230 Park Avenue, New York City, NY, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

LexisNexis Legal & Professional is a leading global provider of legal, regulatory and business information and analytics that help customers increase productivity, improve decision-making and outcomes, and advance the rule of law around the world. We help lawyers win cases, manage their work more efficiently, serve their clients better and grow their practices. We assist corporations in better understanding their markets, monitoring their brands and competition, and in mitigating business risk. We collaborate with universities to educate students, and we support nation-building with governments and courts by making laws accessible and strengthening legal infrastructures. We partner with leading global associations and customers to collect evidence against war criminals and provide tools to combat human trafficking. LexisNexis Legal & Professional, which serves customers in more than 130 countries with 10,000 employees worldwide, is part of RELX Group, a global provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,490
Subsidiaries: 91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codetwo.jpeg
CodeTwo
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexisnexis.jpeg
LexisNexis
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
CodeTwo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LexisNexis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CodeTwo in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LexisNexis in 2025.

Incident History โ€” CodeTwo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CodeTwo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codetwo.jpeg
CodeTwo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexisnexis.jpeg
LexisNexis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CodeTwo company and LexisNexis company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, LexisNexis company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CodeTwo company.

In the current year, LexisNexis company and CodeTwo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LexisNexis company nor CodeTwo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LexisNexis company nor CodeTwo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LexisNexis company nor CodeTwo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CodeTwo company nor LexisNexis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

LexisNexis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CodeTwo company.

LexisNexis company employs more people globally than CodeTwo company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X