Comparison Overview

Cockle Legal Briefs

VS

Pankratz & Hodge, P.A.

Cockle Legal Briefs

2311 Douglas St., Omaha, NE, 68102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Better Briefs Win. At Cockle Legal Briefs, we’re industry leaders in the production of legal briefs. We’re here to manage the entire process of brief preparation – from consultation to filing. Our clients include several Am Law 100 firms, state Attorneys General, Supreme Court clinics at some of the nation’s premier law schools, national public interest organizations, and solo practitioners. We also maintain an excellent working relationship with the Clerk’s Office at the U.S. Supreme Court.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pankratz & Hodge, P.A.

301 N. Main St., Newton, Kansas, 67114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. has over 50 years of experience as a full service firm, handling the needs of clients in a variety of legal settings including corporate and business law, employment law, estate planning, family law, natural resources law, and civil litigation. The firm is committed to the highest standards of practice and exceptional service to its clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adrian-&-pankratz-pa.jpeg
Pankratz & Hodge, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cockle Legal Briefs
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pankratz & Hodge, P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cockle Legal Briefs in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Cockle Legal Briefs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cockle Legal Briefs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cockle-legal-briefs-.jpeg
Cockle Legal Briefs
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adrian-&-pankratz-pa.jpeg
Pankratz & Hodge, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cockle Legal Briefs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cockle Legal Briefs company.

In the current year, Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company and Cockle Legal Briefs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company nor Cockle Legal Briefs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company nor Cockle Legal Briefs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company nor Cockle Legal Briefs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs company nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs company nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Cockle Legal Briefs company and Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cockle Legal Briefs nor Pankratz & Hodge, P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X