Comparison Overview

Cobb County Government

VS

GSA

Cobb County Government

100 Cherokee Street, Marietta, GA, 30090, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

About Cobb County Government Cobb County Government proudly employs over 5,000 people, making us one of the premier employers in Cobb County, Georgia. We are committed to offering competitive salaries and exceptional benefits, including: Four medical plan options Dental and life insurance A Hybrid pension plan Access to a wellness clinic and two fitness centers Paid holidays, sick, and annual leave A sick-time buy-back program Various supplemental benefit options Since our founding in 1832, Cobb County has grown into a vibrant part of the Atlanta metropolitan area. Our county boasts charming communities, top-performing schools, low property taxes, expansive parks, and recreational facilities. With an ever-growing business landscape, Cobb County remains an attractive place to live, work, and play. As the third-largest county in Georgia with an estimated population of 717,190, there’s always something to explore here. Outdoor enthusiasts can enjoy adventures like rafting along the Chattahoochee River, cycling the scenic 12.8-mile Silver Comet Trail, or participating in league sports. For arts and culture, the Cobb Energy Performing Arts Centre offers world-class performances, including Broadway shows, concerts, ballet, and opera. Located just 20 minutes from downtown Atlanta, Cobb County offers easy access to major sports teams, including the Atlanta Falcons, Atlanta Hawks, and Atlanta Braves. Cobb County itself is home to Atlanta United FC and has hosted countless exciting events for sports fans and families alike. Join Cobb County Government and be part of a community that blends professional growth with an exceptional quality of life. #CobbCountyGovernment #PremierEmployer #CobbCountyGA #AtlantaMetro #Careers #workforCobb

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,327
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

GSA

1800 F St. NW, Washington, 20405, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), and a variety of Service and Staff Offices. Learn more about our organization at gsa.gov. Our Mission GSA's mission is to deliver value and savings in real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-support services across government. Our Vision Effective and efficient government for the American people. Our Values Service, Accountability, and Innovation ----------- You can also find us on these social media sites: Twitter: https://twitter.com/usgsa Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GSA/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usgsa/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,645
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobb-county-government.jpeg
Cobb County Government
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cobb County Government
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cobb County Government in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSA in 2026.

Incident History — Cobb County Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cobb County Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobb-county-government.jpeg
Cobb County Government
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cobb County Government company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cobb County Government company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GSA company has not reported any.

In the current year, GSA company and Cobb County Government company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GSA company nor Cobb County Government company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Cobb County Government company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GSA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GSA company nor Cobb County Government company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cobb County Government company nor GSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cobb County Government company.

GSA company employs more people globally than Cobb County Government company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cobb County Government nor GSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N