Comparison Overview

Coast to Coast Label

VS

Royal Printing

Coast to Coast Label

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://coasttocoastlabel.com

Coast to Coast Label is a national convertor/distributor of a wide variety of adhesive papers and films. Having over forty years of combined knowledge of the label paper and printing industry, we are committed to helping you find the correct label stock for each application and provide you with alternatives to the standard label papers on the market today. Our goal is offer stock solutions as well as custom “outside the box” type of solutions in order to possibly save you time and money and extra steps. We are continually researching new products in an effort to broaden our solutions and make your decisions easier. You have our promise that we will provide you with personal, outstanding customer service at all times. We understand that you have many choices for label paper in today’s market. Our commitment to service and the quality and value of our products are what sets us apart from our competition.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Royal Printing

2615 Ellington Rd., Quincy, IL, US, 62305
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royal-printing.com

Royal Printing is a full service commercial printing company. We print everything from letterheads and envelopes to books and full color magazines. Have a different shaped project, no problem. Royal can custom design, die cut and finish and project to meet your needs. Being located in the midwest provides easy access to anywhere in the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coast-to-coast-label.jpeg
Coast to Coast Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing.jpeg
Royal Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coast to Coast Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coast to Coast Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Coast to Coast Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coast to Coast Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coast-to-coast-label.jpeg
Coast to Coast Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing.jpeg
Royal Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coast to Coast Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coast to Coast Label company.

In the current year, Royal Printing company and Coast to Coast Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Printing company nor Coast to Coast Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Printing company nor Coast to Coast Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Printing company nor Coast to Coast Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coast to Coast Label company nor Royal Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coast to Coast Label company nor Royal Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Printing company employs more people globally than Coast to Coast Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coast to Coast Label nor Royal Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References