Comparison Overview

CNRS

VS

Imperial College London

CNRS

3 rue Michel-Ange, Paris, FR, 75016
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The French National Centre for Scientific Research is among the world's leading research institutions. Its scientists explore the living world, matter, the Universe, and the functioning of human societies in order to meet the major challenges of today and tomorrow. Internationally recognised for the excellence of its scientific research, the CNRS is a reference in the world of research and development, as well as for the general public.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 12,680
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus, London, GB, SW7 2AZ
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Consistently rated in the top 10 universities in the world, Imperial College London is the only university in the UK to focus exclusively on science, medicine, engineering and business. At Imperial we bring together people, disciplines, industries and sectors to further our understanding of the natural world, solve major engineering problems, lead the data revolution and improve health and well-being.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 16,893
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnrs.jpeg
CNRS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-college-london.jpeg
Imperial College London
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CNRS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Imperial College London
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CNRS in 2025.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imperial College London in 2025.

Incident History — CNRS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNRS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Imperial College London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imperial College London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnrs.jpeg
CNRS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-college-london.jpeg
Imperial College London
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Imperial College London company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CNRS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Imperial College London company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CNRS company.

In the current year, Imperial College London company and CNRS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Imperial College London company nor CNRS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Imperial College London company nor CNRS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Imperial College London company nor CNRS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CNRS company nor Imperial College London company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Imperial College London company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CNRS company.

Imperial College London company employs more people globally than CNRS company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CNRS nor Imperial College London holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X