Comparison Overview

CNA Insurance

VS

Gallagher

CNA Insurance

151 N Franklin St, None, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60606
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

CNA is one of the largest U.S. commercial property and casualty insurance companies. Backed by more than 125 years of experience, CNA provides a broad range of standard and specialized insurance products and services for businesses and professionals in the U.S., Canada and Europe.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 7,222
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, None, Rolling Meadows, IL, US, 60008
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running, and enable individuals and families to face their future with confidence. Gallagher provides retail and wholesale property and casualty brokerage, alternative risk transfer services, employee benefit consulting, and actuarial services. Gallagher also offers claims and information management, risk control consulting and appraisal services, human resource consulting, and retirement services. Follow us on social: Instagram: http://instagram.com/gallagherglobal Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/GallagherGlobal Twitter: https://twitter.com/GallagherGlobal YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/GallagherGlobal

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 43,519
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cna-insurance.jpeg
CNA Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CNA Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gallagher
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CNA Insurance in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2025.

Incident History — CNA Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNA Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cna-insurance.jpeg
CNA Insurance
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Network Access
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gallagher company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CNA Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Gallagher company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to CNA Insurance company.

In the current year, Gallagher company and CNA Insurance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

CNA Insurance company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gallagher company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Gallagher company and CNA Insurance company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Gallagher company nor CNA Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CNA Insurance company nor Gallagher company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gallagher company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CNA Insurance company.

Gallagher company employs more people globally than CNA Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CNA Insurance nor Gallagher holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X