Comparison Overview

CME Printing, Inc.

VS

Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co.

CME Printing, Inc.

8181 Commerce Park Drive, Suite 708, Houston, Tx, 77036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

CME Printing. is a leading custom printing, design, fulfillment, mailing, offset printing company. We have been in business since 1976 and operate out of Houston, Texas. Throughout the years, our family has dedicated itself to advancing communication technology. Our allegiance is deeper than corporate policy, it is who we are and what we believe. Our goal is to fully understand your strategic objectives and develop specific solutions that deliver. Our passion is undeniable, it is in our DNA. We form long-term partnerships built to last. CME has the right mix of people, equipment, and web based solutions ready to support you anytime, anywhere. Our Code CME Printing holds to the tradition of God and family first. Letting integrity guide our thoughts and actions, being trustworthy and impacting our community with honor, while adding value to our marketplace.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co.

13748 F St, Omaha, Nebraska, 68137, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Epsen Hillmer Graphics is a family owned label printing company founded in 1908. We print labels for a variety of industries including the Beverage, Household Products, Food, Health & Beauty, Supermarket & Grocery, and Other Specialty Markets. We are known for printing on a diverse set of label applications including: Pressure Sensitive, Roll to Roll, Cut and Stack, and In Mold. At Epsen Hillmer Graphics, we are committed toward providing the highest levels of customer service and we specialize in finding customized solutions for your unique needs and budget. To enhance your service experience we have an in-house Art Department, highly trained Customer Service Representatives and Sales Consultants who believe in developing lasting business partnerships. Having operated in this industry for more than 100 years, we fully understand what it takes to provide an outstanding supplier relationship to our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cme-printing-inc-.jpeg
CME Printing, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epsen-hillmer-graphics.jpeg
Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CME Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CME Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. in 2025.

Incident History — CME Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CME Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cme-printing-inc-.jpeg
CME Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epsen-hillmer-graphics.jpeg
Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CME Printing, Inc. company and Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CME Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company and CME Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company nor CME Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company nor CME Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company nor CME Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. company nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. company nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. company employs more people globally than CME Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CME Printing, Inc. nor Epsen Hillmer Graphics Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N