Comparison Overview

Clockwork Productions Inc

VS

Cris Ray Printing

Clockwork Productions Inc

1645 Queensway E, MISSISSAUGA, Ontario, L4X3A3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.clockworkpro.ca

Consider us a one stop shop for all marketing and promotional needs. Anyone can push a print button, what we bring to the table is a can-do, detail-focused attitude where we collaborate with you to bring your vision to life. We believe in having a personal touch. It’s not uncommon to see Frank or any of our team members walk through the door with proofs or to personally deliver a final product; we are proud of what we do and take care to ensure each project is flawless from inception to delivery. In our continually evolving market we offer unique solutions to conventional printing and fabrication, we don’t shy away from different, different is where we thrive and work to innovate new ways to get your message across. So, feel free to give us a call, shoot us an email, or stop by, we’d like to get to know you and your business to see what we can do to make an impact out there.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cris Ray Printing

50 Executive Blvd, Farmingdale, New York, 11735, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crisray.com

Founded in 1971, Cris Ray has grown to become a multi-million dollar enterprise, serving clients worldwide. The experience and passion of our staff, utilizing our advanced technology systems has been the driving force behind our growth and attainment of our industry leading position. As specialists in the manufacture of pressure sensitive labels for the nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, specialty food and wine, cosmetic and consumer goods industries. Cris Ray products set the standard for both quality and aesthetics in automated inline packaging.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clockwork-pro.jpeg
Clockwork Productions Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cris-ray-printing.jpeg
Cris Ray Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clockwork Productions Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cris Ray Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clockwork Productions Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cris Ray Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Clockwork Productions Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clockwork Productions Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cris Ray Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cris Ray Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clockwork-pro.jpeg
Clockwork Productions Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cris-ray-printing.jpeg
Cris Ray Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clockwork Productions Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cris Ray Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cris Ray Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clockwork Productions Inc company.

In the current year, Cris Ray Printing company and Clockwork Productions Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cris Ray Printing company nor Clockwork Productions Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cris Ray Printing company nor Clockwork Productions Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cris Ray Printing company nor Clockwork Productions Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc company nor Cris Ray Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc company nor Cris Ray Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cris Ray Printing company employs more people globally than Clockwork Productions Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clockwork Productions Inc nor Cris Ray Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References