Comparison Overview

Clipper Controls

VS

Spectrum Controls

Clipper Controls

660 Bercut Drive, Sacramento, California, 95811, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.clippercontrols.com/

Clipper Controls matters! We help companies and agencies solve our most pressing issues: energy, water, food, health, security, and improving our environment. We do this by specializing in instrumentation, controls, analytical solutions. Our territory focus is California, Nevada, and Hawaii, and we are the sales channel of choice for many of the best manufacturers in this field including: Teledyne, Honeywell, Panametrics, Servomex, Moore Industries, Kurz Instruments and others.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Spectrum Controls

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://landing.spectrumcontrols.com/about-spectrum-controls

Solutions Geared for Industrial Applications® Since 1983, Spectrum Controls has continued to be the premier provider of hardware and related software products for the industrial controls marketplace. Products fall into three major categories: I/O modules, Secure Remote Access and Communication devices as well as NEMA rated LED Display solutions. Our corporate headquarters is located in Bellevue, Washington.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clipper-controls.jpeg
Clipper Controls
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spectrum-controls.jpeg
Spectrum Controls
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clipper Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spectrum Controls
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clipper Controls in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spectrum Controls in 2025.

Incident History — Clipper Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clipper Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spectrum Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spectrum Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clipper-controls.jpeg
Clipper Controls
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spectrum-controls.jpeg
Spectrum Controls
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spectrum Controls company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clipper Controls company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spectrum Controls company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clipper Controls company.

In the current year, Spectrum Controls company and Clipper Controls company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spectrum Controls company nor Clipper Controls company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spectrum Controls company nor Clipper Controls company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spectrum Controls company nor Clipper Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clipper Controls company nor Spectrum Controls company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clipper Controls company nor Spectrum Controls company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Spectrum Controls company employs more people globally than Clipper Controls company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clipper Controls nor Spectrum Controls holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References