Comparison Overview

Clinic

VS

IPG Mediabrands

Clinic

20-24 Broadwick St, Soho, London, GB, W1F 8HT
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people and their experience, no matter what the context or media. Born a Virgin company, the core principles of challenging the norm and putting people front and centre have served us well over the years. And they’ve served the many brands we’ve worked with even better. What does that mean in the real world? Launching products & services, increasing subscriber numbers, helping multi-faceted businesses feel human and showing brands how to be themselves. Whatever we’re doing, the core is understanding people and solving problems creatively. It’s what we’ve done for over 30 years, and it still drives us forward. We call it being something else.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 16,986
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IPG Mediabrands

Last Update: 2025-11-21

IPG Mediabrands is the media and marketing solutions division of Interpublic Group (NYSE: IPG). IPG Mediabrands manages over $47 billion in marketing investment globally on behalf of its clients across its full-service agency networks UM, Initiative and Mediahub and through its award-winning specialized business units Healix, KINESSO, MAGNA, Mediabrands Content Studio, Orion Holdings, Rapport, and the IPG Media Lab. IPG Mediabrands clients include many of the world’s most recognizable and iconic brands from a broad portfolio of industry sectors including automotive, personal finance, consumer product goods (CPG), pharma, health and wellness, entertainment, financial services, energy, toys and gaming, direct to consumer and e-commerce, retail, hospitality, food and beverage, fashion and beauty. The company employs more than 18,000 diverse marketing communication professionals in more than 130 countries. Learn more at www.ipgmediabrands.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 11,224
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinic.jpeg
Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipgmediabrands.jpeg
IPG Mediabrands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IPG Mediabrands
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clinic in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPG Mediabrands in 2025.

Incident History — Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IPG Mediabrands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPG Mediabrands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinic.jpeg
Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipgmediabrands.jpeg
IPG Mediabrands
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IPG Mediabrands company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clinic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IPG Mediabrands company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clinic company.

In the current year, IPG Mediabrands company and Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IPG Mediabrands company nor Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IPG Mediabrands company nor Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IPG Mediabrands company nor Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clinic company nor IPG Mediabrands company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IPG Mediabrands company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clinic company.

Clinic company employs more people globally than IPG Mediabrands company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clinic nor IPG Mediabrands holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H