Comparison Overview

ClientServ Technologies Inc.

VS

Netronome

ClientServ Technologies Inc.

Suite 160, Richmond, BC, V6W 1H3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.clientserv.com

To succeed in today's competitive environment, businesses need to maintain an ever increasing and diverse infrastructure. ClientServ has the skills to understand your network from end - to - end. And we can address integration issues because we have a diverse mix of experts that can assist with any of your infrastructure requirements.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Netronome

330 Perry Hwy, Harmony, 16037, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.netronome.com

Netronome designs and delivers server networking and coprocessor platforms, including its market leading silicon accelerators, SmartNICs and software, enabling customers to increase the efficiency and security of their modern data center infrastructure. Our technology can also be purchased as hardened IP blocks to build custom SoC silicon devices. Our solutions enable rapid innovation at lower cost and power through domain-specific, open and efficient programming models and ability to offload network and security processing. Netronome has a global footprint and is headquartered in Santa Clara, CA. To learn more about Netronome and its products, please visit www.netronome.com.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clientserv-technologies-inc..jpeg
ClientServ Technologies Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netronome.jpeg
Netronome
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ClientServ Technologies Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Netronome
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ClientServ Technologies Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Netronome in 2025.

Incident History — ClientServ Technologies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ClientServ Technologies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Netronome (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Netronome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clientserv-technologies-inc..jpeg
ClientServ Technologies Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netronome.jpeg
Netronome
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ClientServ Technologies Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Netronome company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Netronome company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ClientServ Technologies Inc. company.

In the current year, Netronome company and ClientServ Technologies Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Netronome company nor ClientServ Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Netronome company nor ClientServ Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Netronome company nor ClientServ Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. company nor Netronome company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. company nor Netronome company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Netronome company employs more people globally than ClientServ Technologies Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor Netronome holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References