Comparison Overview

ClientServ Technologies Inc.

VS

MiRO

ClientServ Technologies Inc.

Suite 160, Richmond, BC, V6W 1H3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

To succeed in today's competitive environment, businesses need to maintain an ever increasing and diverse infrastructure. ClientServ has the skills to understand your network from end - to - end. And we can address integration issues because we have a diverse mix of experts that can assist with any of your infrastructure requirements.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MiRO

Nr 9 Landmarks Avenue , Pretoria, 0153, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a responsible supplier to the growing IP convergence industries, distributing and supporting technologies such as Wireless Broadband, Wi-Fi, Networking, Routing, VoIP, IoT, Fibre, Access Control and IP Video. We only supply best-of-breed products, deliver strong pre and after-sales technical support, internationally-certified trainings, as well as finance solutions to our customers. We serve and support business partners in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Angola, Mozambique, Lesotho, and Swaziland. Our brands include: Cambium Networks , Ubiquiti , Grandstream , BDCOM , MikroTik , Siklu , Tenda , Ring , TP-Link , Mimosa , Ignitenet , Acconet , Edge-coreE , Radwin , RF Elements and more.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clientserv-technologies-inc..jpeg
ClientServ Technologies Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miro-distribution.jpeg
MiRO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ClientServ Technologies Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MiRO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ClientServ Technologies Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MiRO in 2025.

Incident History — ClientServ Technologies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ClientServ Technologies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MiRO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MiRO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clientserv-technologies-inc..jpeg
ClientServ Technologies Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miro-distribution.jpeg
MiRO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ClientServ Technologies Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MiRO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MiRO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ClientServ Technologies Inc. company.

In the current year, MiRO company and ClientServ Technologies Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MiRO company nor ClientServ Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MiRO company nor ClientServ Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MiRO company nor ClientServ Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. company nor MiRO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. company nor MiRO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MiRO company employs more people globally than ClientServ Technologies Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ClientServ Technologies Inc. nor MiRO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.