Comparison Overview

CLEVO藍天電腦

VS

NVIDIA

CLEVO藍天電腦

35F., No.555, Siyuan Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City 242034, Taiwan (R.O.C.), Taipei, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

Established in 1983, CLEVO is the leading ODM/OEM manufacturer specializing in hardware solutions for notebooks, tablets and All-in-One PCs. Customer satisfaction is always our number one priority. Our pioneering R&D team is committed to the building of a superior future. Our long experience in the field, professionalism, manufacturing expertise and the most complete product line in the industry seal our reputation for being thepremier hardware partner for worldwide OEMs. CLEVO offers complete solutions for global ODM/OEM partners.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, None, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95050
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The company’s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of the metaverse. NVIDIA is now a full-stack computing company with data-center-scale offerings that are reshaping industry.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 41,594
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clevo.jpeg
CLEVO藍天電腦
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvidia.jpeg
NVIDIA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CLEVO藍天電腦
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NVIDIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

CLEVO藍天電腦 has 112.77% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NVIDIA has 751.06% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — CLEVO藍天電腦 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CLEVO藍天電腦 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clevo.jpeg
CLEVO藍天電腦
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Firmware Update
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvidia.jpeg
NVIDIA
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Rowhammer, Bluetooth Exploits, Phishing, Data Theft
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via shared memory manipulation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local access with low privileges needed to exploit vulnerabilities via specially crafted files
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NVIDIA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CLEVO藍天電腦 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NVIDIA company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to CLEVO藍天電腦 company.

In the current year, NVIDIA company has reported more cyber incidents than CLEVO藍天電腦 company.

Neither NVIDIA company nor CLEVO藍天電腦 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NVIDIA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CLEVO藍天電腦 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NVIDIA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CLEVO藍天電腦 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both CLEVO藍天電腦 company and NVIDIA company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NVIDIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CLEVO藍天電腦 company.

NVIDIA company employs more people globally than CLEVO藍天電腦 company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware Manufacturing.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CLEVO藍天電腦 nor NVIDIA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H