Comparison Overview

Cleveland Grays Armory Museum

VS

Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada

Cleveland Grays Armory Museum

1234 Bolivar Road, Cleveland, 44115, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Cleveland Grays Armory Museum: America's Oldest Independent Armory. Grays Armory Museum is the home of the Cleveland Grays, a small non-profit, founded in 1837. The Cleveland Grays are a historical pre-Civil War Militia. The Grays would see battle in many American conflicts. The most notable are: the Civil War, Spanish American War and WWI. The Grays built their current armory in 1893 and it is still privately owned by the Grays. The Cleveland Grays Armory is the oldest Armory that is owned by its private civilian militia in America today. It is not only a city landmark but also on the National Register of Historical Places. The Cleveland Grays Armory Museum chronicles the Cleveland Grays from conception through today. We house many artifacts and preserve this beautiful Richardsonian Romanesqe Style building. The building has always doubled as a special event venue and we continue with that tradition today. Make Your Next Event A Part of History At Cleveland's Downtown Castle. The Cleveland Grays Armory Museum is a beautiful historic landmark in downtown Cleveland. Its unique and breathtaking architecture adds character and charisma to any event. We have hosted: Private Parties, Fundraisers, Rehearsal Dinners, Weddings, Sporting Events, Holiday Parties, Meetings and Seminars. The Armory has many rooms and areas that can be rented for different types of functions and events. Call today and find out how you can make your event a part of history!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada

undefined, Toronto, Ontario, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799

MOCA Toronto is an inclusive cultural hub at the heart of the art ecosystem. MOCA supports and promotes forward-thinking artistic experimentation and provides a community space for enrichment, discourse, collaboration and creativity. Working across all contemporary art forms, MOCA’s exhibitions, installations and programmes empower local artists and engage the Toronto art scene while contributing to international dialogue and scholarship. MOCA presents rotating exhibitions and programmes that prioritize artistic production post-2000, primarily through commissioning new work. The museum values artistic freedom and production, its relationships with artists and broad accessibility, with programming that includes in-person and online learning opportunities, workshops, tours, teacher resources, publications and mentoring programmes for the local arts community. MOCA actively cultivates partnerships with other arts and culture organizations, government agencies, educational institutions and neighbourhood community-based projects to further engage residents and visitors to our culturally rich and hyper-diverse city. MOCA is a nonprofit charitable organization. Our Vision: The Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto is at the heart of the art ecosystem. MOCA will be ambitiously inclusive, interdisciplinary and internationally renowned through our work with artists. A place for everyone to explore that provokes ideas and discussion and challenges the current cultural moment. Our Mission: Artists, relationships and experimentation are at the centre of everything we do. MOCA Toronto presents rotating exhibitions and programmes that prioritize twenty-first-century artistic production, primarily through commissioning new work. We foster active dialogue, participation and celebrate complexity; in order to serve as an inclusive cultural hub in this hyper-diverse city and world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cleveland Grays Armory Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-contemporary-art_toronto_canada.jpeg
Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cleveland Grays Armory Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cleveland Grays Armory Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada in 2026.

Incident History — Cleveland Grays Armory Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cleveland Grays Armory Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cleveland Grays Armory Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-contemporary-art_toronto_canada.jpeg
Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company.

In the current year, Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company and Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company nor Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company nor Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company nor Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada company employs more people globally than Cleveland Grays Armory Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cleveland Grays Armory Museum nor Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N