Comparison Overview

Clearwater Legal

VS

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers

Clearwater Legal

650 Massachusetts Ave NW Ste 500, Washington, DC - District of Columbia, 20001-3705, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

WHO WE ARE Clearwater Legal is based in Washington, DC and New York, NY and led by a team of accomplished industry veterans with a breadth of experience working at AmLaw 100 firms and building innovative and successful service providers. Our management team possesses decades of combined experience in the industry. WHAT WE DO Clearwater Legal is a nation-wide provider of document review services, integrated e-discovery and specialized legal staffing solutions. As a growth-oriented, private company, we are exceptionally responsive and flexible in meeting client demands. Clearwater Legal also provides clients with our proprietary software, Law Staff Portal, which integrates and streamlines multiple elements of project staffing and management.establishes relationships with legal professionals who are seeking temporary assignments. We will work with you in finding the right legal professional for your needs. We provide 24/7 support for your legal professional needs. DEDICATED SERVICE We build trust with our clients with an unrelenting commitment to responsiveness, integrity, and providing value-enhancing services. At Clearwater Legal, we focus on the fundamentals – meticulous attention to detail and providing personnel with proven records of success on prior client engagements. We aim to always exceed our clients’ expectations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers

420 George Street, SYDNEY, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers is a specialist planning, environment and local government firm in NSW. Formed in 2004, the firm acts for a range of public and private clients including state government departments and agencies, local government authorities and major private sector developers. The firm's lawyers have an unrivaled skill set and expertise in relation to planning and development law, environment law, and local government and administrative law, including a specialist focus in relation to development contributions and infrastructure funding.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindsay-taylor-lawyers.jpeg
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clearwater Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clearwater Legal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindsay Taylor Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Clearwater Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clearwater Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clearwater-legal.jpeg
Clearwater Legal
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindsay-taylor-lawyers.jpeg
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Clearwater Legal company and Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clearwater Legal company.

In the current year, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company and Clearwater Legal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company nor Clearwater Legal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company nor Clearwater Legal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company nor Clearwater Legal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clearwater Legal company nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clearwater Legal company.

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company employs more people globally than Clearwater Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clearwater Legal nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X