Comparison Overview

Clear Language Institute, Inc.

VS

The Heritage Council

Clear Language Institute, Inc.

34234, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.clearlangiageinstitute.org

The Clear Language Institute is a non-profit, 501(c)3 corporation whose mission is to make sure that all amendments, referenda or other propositions that Americans vote on are written in simple, clear language that is easily understood by voters. To accomplish this, we will use consumer testing, public education, and any available legal means to remove badly written, vague, or confusing propositions from the ballot. We see absolutely no reason why legislators cannot present their ideas in language that is easily understood. Or why American voters should be asked to cast their votes on propositions they do not understand.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Heritage Council

Church Lane, Kilkenny, IE
Last Update:
Between 700 and 749
http://www.heritagecouncil.ie

The Heritage Council was established as a statutory body under the Heritage Act, 1995. It takes an integrated approach to heritage, with responsibilities that include both its cultural and natural aspects. The Heritage Act provides a definition of ‘heritage’ - and its breadth is truly comprehensive. Charity Reg no: 20036867 It includes monuments, archaeological objects, art and industrial works, documents and genealogical records, architectural heritage, flora, fauna, wildlife habitats, landscapes, seascapes, wrecks, geology, heritage gardens, parks and inland waterways. The mission of the Heritage Council is governed by the Heritage Act 1995 which requires the Council to propose policies and priorities for the identification, protection, preservation and enhancement of the national heritage. The Heritage Council is charged with: *Promoting interest, education, knowledge, pride and care of our national heritage and supporting appreciation and enjoyment of our heritage *Co-operating with public authorities, education bodies and others in the promotion of its functions *Advancing the co-ordination of all activities related to the functions of the Council The Heritage Council aims to ensure that our heritage is managed and conserved to enrich the lives of people now and for the future. We will continue to promote and nurture our heritage as a source of personal, community and national well-being.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Clear Language Institute, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heritage-council.jpeg
The Heritage Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clear Language Institute, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Heritage Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clear Language Institute, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Heritage Council in 2025.

Incident History — Clear Language Institute, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clear Language Institute, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Heritage Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Heritage Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Clear Language Institute, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heritage-council.jpeg
The Heritage Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clear Language Institute, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Heritage Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Heritage Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clear Language Institute, Inc. company.

In the current year, The Heritage Council company and Clear Language Institute, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Heritage Council company nor Clear Language Institute, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Heritage Council company nor Clear Language Institute, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Heritage Council company nor Clear Language Institute, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. company nor The Heritage Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. company nor The Heritage Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Heritage Council company employs more people globally than Clear Language Institute, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clear Language Institute, Inc. nor The Heritage Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References