Comparison Overview

Clear Channel Europe

VS

VML

Clear Channel Europe

33 Golden Square, London, England, W1F 9, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Clear Channel Europe is a division of leading global Out of Home media company, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCO). The Clear Channel Europe portfolio spans 14 markets with 260,000 advertising panels. Clear Channel Europe has 2,600 dedicated employees. Our Mission is To Create the future of media. Transforming our estate, to the benefit of all our stakeholders, through data-driven innovations and infrastructure. Our Purpose is to provide both A Platform for Brands & A Platform for Good. Delivering advertisers’ media objectives whilst having a positive impact on the world around us.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,759
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

VML

3 WTC 175 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

VML is a global powerhouse born from the unification of Wunderman Thompson and VMLY&R — two of the world's most powerful and accomplished creative agencies with complementary capabilities and geographic strengths. We have an industry-unique opportunity to provide our client partners with a fully integrated offering across brand experience, customer experience and commerce practices — powered by deep data and technology experience. For more information, visit www.vml.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 29,881
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clear-channel.jpeg
Clear Channel Europe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmlyr.jpeg
VML
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clear Channel Europe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VML
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clear Channel Europe in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VML in 2025.

Incident History — Clear Channel Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clear Channel Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clear-channel.jpeg
Clear Channel Europe
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmlyr.jpeg
VML
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

VML company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clear Channel Europe company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Clear Channel Europe company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas VML company has not reported any.

In the current year, VML company and Clear Channel Europe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VML company nor Clear Channel Europe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Clear Channel Europe company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other VML company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VML company nor Clear Channel Europe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clear Channel Europe company nor VML company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VML company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clear Channel Europe company.

VML company employs more people globally than Clear Channel Europe company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor VML holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N