Comparison Overview

Clear Channel Europe

VS

Ogilvy

Clear Channel Europe

33 Golden Square, London, England, W1F 9, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Clear Channel Europe is a division of leading global Out of Home media company, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCO). The Clear Channel Europe portfolio spans 14 markets with 260,000 advertising panels. Clear Channel Europe has 2,600 dedicated employees. Our Mission is To Create the future of media. Transforming our estate, to the benefit of all our stakeholders, through data-driven innovations and infrastructure. Our Purpose is to provide both A Platform for Brands & A Platform for Good. Delivering advertisers’ media objectives whilst having a positive impact on the world around us.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,759
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Ogilvy

175 Greenwich St, New York, NY, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, public relations, relationship design, consulting, and health capabilities with experts collaborating seamlessly across over 120 offices in nearly 90 countries. We are proud to currently rank as the #1 global agency network for creative excellence and effectiveness by WARC, signifying our ability to deliver creative solutions that drive unreasonable impact for clients and communities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11,995
Subsidiaries: 53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clear-channel.jpeg
Clear Channel Europe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogilvy.jpeg
Ogilvy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clear Channel Europe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ogilvy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clear Channel Europe in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ogilvy in 2025.

Incident History — Clear Channel Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clear Channel Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ogilvy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ogilvy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clear-channel.jpeg
Clear Channel Europe
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogilvy.jpeg
Ogilvy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ogilvy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clear Channel Europe company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Clear Channel Europe company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ogilvy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ogilvy company and Clear Channel Europe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ogilvy company nor Clear Channel Europe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Clear Channel Europe company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ogilvy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ogilvy company nor Clear Channel Europe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clear Channel Europe company nor Ogilvy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ogilvy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clear Channel Europe company.

Clear Channel Europe company employs more people globally than Ogilvy company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clear Channel Europe nor Ogilvy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N