Comparison Overview

Cleantech Law Partners

VS

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo

Cleantech Law Partners

548 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, 94104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Cleantech Law Partners is a full-service law firm dedicated exclusively to the renewable energy industry. Our clients include renewable energy project developers, cleantech companies, financiers, manufacturers, and entrepreneurs. We counsel clients on a variety of legal matters involving cleantech technologies and alternative energy projects, including: development of renewable energy projects, advice on renewable energy tax matters, permitting solar energy systems, renewable energy project finance, negotiating power purchase agreements (PPAs), analyzing federal and state regulations, drafting leases and real estate agreements, reviewing and drafting EPC agreements, securing intellectual property rights, applying for renewable energy grant programs, developing alternative energy projects, drafting corporate sustainability policies, and advising on renewable energy policy. CLP’s legal team is comprised of experienced cleantech attorneys, leading industry advisors and skilled legal staff who understand the renewable energy sector from both a legal and business perspective. From concept to commercialization, our team is committed to helping our clients navigate the rapidly changing regulatory landscape that governs the renewable energy and cleantech industries, and contribute to its growth and success. http://www.cleantechlaw.com [email protected] 866.233.8064

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo

12800 Center Court Drive, Suite 300, None, Cerritos, CA, US, 90703
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo is a full-service law firm with over 200 attorneys in nine offices throughout California. We represent both private and public sector clients, with emphasis in the areas of employment, labor, construction, education, real estate, water, general business and business litigation, corporate and taxation. Through decades of dedicated commitment to high quality legal work and providing consistently practical management solutions to our clients, AALRR has earned a reputation as one of California’s leading law firms.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 412
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleantech-law-partners.jpeg
Cleantech Law Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atkinson-andelson-loya-ruud-&-romo.jpeg
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cleantech Law Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cleantech Law Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo in 2025.

Incident History — Cleantech Law Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cleantech Law Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleantech-law-partners.jpeg
Cleantech Law Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atkinson-andelson-loya-ruud-&-romo.jpeg
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Physical Device (Laptop)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Cleantech Law Partners company and Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cleantech Law Partners company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company and Cleantech Law Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company nor Cleantech Law Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cleantech Law Partners company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company nor Cleantech Law Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners company nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners company nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo company employs more people globally than Cleantech Law Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cleantech Law Partners nor Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X