Comparison Overview

CleanMark

VS

WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels

CleanMark

6700 SW Bradbury Ct, Portland, OR, 97224, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

CleanMark Labels is the industry leader in providing innovative and reliable labeling solutions tailored for cleanroom environments and demanding industrial applications. Our extensive expertise and commitment to excellence enable us to support the critical work of leading companies in semiconductor, pharmaceutical, medical device, and other high-tech sectors. By partnering with companies such as Intel, Micron, Lam Research, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Pfizer, we ensure that our labels meet the highest standards of performance, compliance, and durability. Additionally, our durable labeling solutions are engineered to withstand extreme conditions such as ultra-low temperatures, high heat, and exposure to harsh chemicals, ensuring reliable performance in the most challenging environments. Known for our consultative approach, we work closely with our customers to understand their unique needs and solve the toughest label challenges. Our mission is to empower our customers to focus on their groundbreaking work by delivering labeling solutions that are as dependable and precise as their innovations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels

5115 Prospect Street, Thomasville, NC, 27360, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Tell your story in an instant. Win their hearts forever. Imagine the possibilities when your brand is backed by an industry-leading team of creatives, problem solvers, and service-oriented people who are passionate about every detail required for your brand’s success. Our commitment and experience shine through in everything we produce and deliver, every time. It’s the Wright way.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wright-global-graphic-solutions.jpeg
WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CleanMark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CleanMark in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels in 2025.

Incident History — CleanMark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CleanMark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wright-global-graphic-solutions.jpeg
WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CleanMark company and WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CleanMark company.

In the current year, WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company and CleanMark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CleanMark company nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CleanMark company nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels company employs more people globally than CleanMark company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CleanMark nor WRIGHT Creative Branding & Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N