Comparison Overview

CleanMark

VS

Ink on paper IOP

CleanMark

6700 SW Bradbury Ct, Portland, OR, 97224, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cleanmarklabels.com/

CleanMark Labels is the industry leader in providing innovative and reliable labeling solutions tailored for cleanroom environments and demanding industrial applications. Our extensive expertise and commitment to excellence enable us to support the critical work of leading companies in semiconductor, pharmaceutical, medical device, and other high-tech sectors. By partnering with companies such as Intel, Micron, Lam Research, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Pfizer, we ensure that our labels meet the highest standards of performance, compliance, and durability. Additionally, our durable labeling solutions are engineered to withstand extreme conditions such as ultra-low temperatures, high heat, and exposure to harsh chemicals, ensuring reliable performance in the most challenging environments. Known for our consultative approach, we work closely with our customers to understand their unique needs and solve the toughest label challenges. Our mission is to empower our customers to focus on their groundbreaking work by delivering labeling solutions that are as dependable and precise as their innovations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ink on paper IOP

10 Axis Crescent, Dandenong South, Victoria, 3175, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://inkonpaper.net.au

Ink On Paper works along side its clients to find a cost effective solution to all your signage and print needs. We are bound with no limits, from large format printing to specially designed car wraps. We take a fresh look into print. Whether it is a large campaign or a single print, you can trust IOP to manage your project. Allowing Ink On Paper (IOP) to manage your job means having one point of contact that co-ordinates every element of you print project requirements on time and on Budget.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ink-on-paper.jpeg
Ink on paper IOP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CleanMark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ink on paper IOP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CleanMark in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ink on paper IOP in 2025.

Incident History — CleanMark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CleanMark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ink on paper IOP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ink on paper IOP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ink-on-paper.jpeg
Ink on paper IOP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CleanMark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ink on paper IOP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ink on paper IOP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CleanMark company.

In the current year, Ink on paper IOP company and CleanMark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ink on paper IOP company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ink on paper IOP company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ink on paper IOP company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CleanMark company nor Ink on paper IOP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CleanMark company nor Ink on paper IOP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CleanMark company employs more people globally than Ink on paper IOP company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CleanMark nor Ink on paper IOP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References