Comparison Overview

Clays

VS

Visual Print Solutions

Clays

Popson Street, Bungay, Suffolk, NR35 1ED, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Clays have become a major force in this fluid and evolving world through extensive investment and a determination to react quickly to our customers’ fast moving needs. The result of this is an all round service offering for publishers that encompasses digital services, book manufacture, pre-retailing and distribution. Established 200 years ago, Clays produces in excess of 180 million books a year, all printed and bound at our site in Suffolk. We produce a wide range of titles from the Bible to bestsellers by authors such as Dan Brown and Martina Cole. We are proud to work with most of the major publishing houses in the UK as well as a number of exciting new, and established, independent publishers. Through this digital revolution we have remained the UK’s leading book printing company, and embraced new media alongside the more traditional printing process. We have recently added the role of digital service provider to our services, managing the digital data for media such as apps, iPads and eReaders. Driven by our passion to help make the overall supply chain more cost effective and efficient, we are focusing on moving away from the traditional model of ‘print then sell’ to the more beneficial ‘sell then print’.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 227
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Visual Print Solutions

PO Box 509, Maple Valley , WA, 98038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Are you tired of that same old marketing approach? What do you do to maintain your current client base. We can help you separate yourself from the competition. We print on more than paper. If you can imagine it we can provide it for you. Promotional Products, Apparel, and full service printing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clays.jpeg
Clays
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/visual-print-solutions.jpeg
Visual Print Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clays
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Visual Print Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clays in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Visual Print Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Clays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Visual Print Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Visual Print Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clays.jpeg
Clays
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/visual-print-solutions.jpeg
Visual Print Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clays company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Visual Print Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Visual Print Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clays company.

In the current year, Visual Print Solutions company and Clays company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Visual Print Solutions company nor Clays company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Visual Print Solutions company nor Clays company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Visual Print Solutions company nor Clays company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clays company nor Visual Print Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clays company nor Visual Print Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clays company employs more people globally than Visual Print Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clays nor Visual Print Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N