Comparison Overview

Classic Lifts

VS

Indutrade AB

Classic Lifts

Magna Way, Rotherham, S60 1FE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Classic Lifts a large independent UK national lift company providing professional lift maintenance, repairs, modernisations and new lift installations from five regional branches. We are privately owned by the senior management of the company and currently have over 170 direct employees and a turnover of £19 million. We have over 6,000 lifts under maintenance contracts, with customers ranging from household name retail brands, international hotel groups, schools and universities to smaller nursing homes, residential developments and commercial facilities. Classic Lifts takes pride in providing a high level of customer service, a fast response, expertise, integrity and value for money. Classic is owner-managed and has a friendly approachable team who are informed, professional and committed. We believe this ethos of openness and honesty will allow Classic Lifts Ltd to remain a sustainable business for future generations. Classic Lifts use the latest technology such as PDA's, vehicle trackers, smartphones and scalable operating systems to allow us to plan ahead and stay responsive to our customer needs. We do this whilst retaining the traditional values of in-depth technical knowledge, a balanced common sense approach, rewarding our loyal employees and striving for excellent customer service.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Indutrade AB

Box 6044 Raseborgsgatan 9 Kista, Stockholm 16406, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Indutrade is an international technology and industrial business group that today consists of more than 200 companies around the world. Our business philosophy is based on entrepreneurship and decentralised leadership. This is key to our success and have been so ever since the start in 1978. Companies that become part of the Indutrade family all share our values and our strong belief that at the end of the day, it is all about people − people make the difference!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5,001-10,000
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-lifts.jpeg
Classic Lifts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indutrade-ab.jpeg
Indutrade AB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Classic Lifts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indutrade AB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Classic Lifts in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indutrade AB in 2025.

Incident History — Classic Lifts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Classic Lifts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indutrade AB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indutrade AB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-lifts.jpeg
Classic Lifts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indutrade-ab.jpeg
Indutrade AB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indutrade AB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Classic Lifts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Indutrade AB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Classic Lifts company.

In the current year, Indutrade AB company and Classic Lifts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indutrade AB company nor Classic Lifts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indutrade AB company nor Classic Lifts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indutrade AB company nor Classic Lifts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Classic Lifts company nor Indutrade AB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Indutrade AB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Classic Lifts company.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Indutrade AB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H