Comparison Overview

Classic Lifts

VS

Aerofin

Classic Lifts

Magna Way, Rotherham, S60 1FE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Classic Lifts a large independent UK national lift company providing professional lift maintenance, repairs, modernisations and new lift installations from five regional branches. We are privately owned by the senior management of the company and currently have over 170 direct employees and a turnover of £19 million. We have over 6,000 lifts under maintenance contracts, with customers ranging from household name retail brands, international hotel groups, schools and universities to smaller nursing homes, residential developments and commercial facilities. Classic Lifts takes pride in providing a high level of customer service, a fast response, expertise, integrity and value for money. Classic is owner-managed and has a friendly approachable team who are informed, professional and committed. We believe this ethos of openness and honesty will allow Classic Lifts Ltd to remain a sustainable business for future generations. Classic Lifts use the latest technology such as PDA's, vehicle trackers, smartphones and scalable operating systems to allow us to plan ahead and stay responsive to our customer needs. We do this whilst retaining the traditional values of in-depth technical knowledge, a balanced common sense approach, rewarding our loyal employees and striving for excellent customer service.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aerofin

4621 Murray Place, Lynchburg, VA, 24506, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1923, Aerofin is a leading manufacturer of finned tube heat exchanger coils and related heat transfer equipment and accessories such as process gas coolers/heaters, transformer oil coolers, fan/coil units, integral face & bypass coils, frames for coil removal capabilities, airside transitions and drain pans. Aerofin products serve a variety of industries including HVAC, fossil fuel power generation, nuclear power generation, industrial process, pulp & paper, automotive and petrochemical. Coils are designed and fabricated to virtually any size and configuration using a wide array of construction materials. Additionally, all products can be designed and constructed to the stringent requirements of the ASME code including Section I ("S"​ Stamp), Section III ("N"​ Stamp, Class 1, 2 or 3), and Section VIII ("U"​ Stamp). With the widest range of fluid-to-air/gas heat exchangers available, Aerofin is well equipped to serve your specialty heat transfer equipment needs. Our main office and manufacturing facility with over 150,000 square feet of production area is located in Lynchburg, Virginia. Regional offices are located throughout North America. Call 1-800-AEROFIN (237-6346) for the Aerofin office nearest you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-lifts.jpeg
Classic Lifts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aerofin.jpeg
Aerofin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Classic Lifts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aerofin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Classic Lifts in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aerofin in 2025.

Incident History — Classic Lifts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Classic Lifts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aerofin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aerofin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-lifts.jpeg
Classic Lifts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aerofin.jpeg
Aerofin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Classic Lifts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aerofin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aerofin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Classic Lifts company.

In the current year, Aerofin company and Classic Lifts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aerofin company nor Classic Lifts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aerofin company nor Classic Lifts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aerofin company nor Classic Lifts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Classic Lifts company nor Aerofin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Classic Lifts company nor Aerofin company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Classic Lifts company employs more people globally than Aerofin company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Classic Lifts nor Aerofin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H