Comparison Overview

Classic Design

VS

Summer Classics

Classic Design

19771 Magellan Drive, Torrance, CA 90502, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Classic Design was established in 1986 by Raoul Benassaya, and has grown into one of the most sought after custom design and upholstery services in the country. We incorporate the high quality of traditional upholstery methods with modern design, and pride ourselves on attention to the most specific detail, focusing on precision in every cut, and using only the best quality materials to ensure the most comfortable seat and the most aesthetic look. We perform a wide range of services, including custom furniture and accessories, wall upholstery and window treatments, as well as the restoration and repair for all residential and commercial spaces. Classic Design specializes in the restoration and repair of classic mid-century modern pieces such as Herman Miller, Mies Van Der Rohe, George Nelson, Eames, Knoll, Bertoia, Platner and Wegner.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Summer Classics

3140 Pelham Parkway, Pelham, Alabama, US, 35124
Last Update: 2025-11-23

From a 35+ year legacy of taste, Summer Classics has become the premier manufacturer of luxury outdoor furniture. We innovate with timeless materials like exclusive resin wicker, cast aluminum, teak, and iron. Our beautiful creations enhance the quality of life for our customers and change the way people think about outdoor furniture. Our Purpose: We exist to provide, Life’s best moments… Furnished.™

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 228
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-design-la.jpeg
Classic Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/summerclassics.jpeg
Summer Classics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Classic Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Summer Classics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Classic Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Summer Classics in 2025.

Incident History — Classic Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Classic Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Summer Classics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Summer Classics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-design-la.jpeg
Classic Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/summerclassics.jpeg
Summer Classics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Summer Classics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Classic Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Summer Classics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Classic Design company.

In the current year, Summer Classics company and Classic Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Summer Classics company nor Classic Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Summer Classics company nor Classic Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Summer Classics company nor Classic Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Classic Design company nor Summer Classics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Summer Classics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Classic Design company.

Summer Classics company employs more people globally than Classic Design company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Classic Design nor Summer Classics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.