Comparison Overview

Classic Controls, Inc.

VS

ABI LTD

Classic Controls, Inc.

5095 S Lakeland Dr, Lakeland, Florida 33813-2558, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Classic Controls is a total solutions, single-source provider of industrial process instruments, systems, valves and equipment. Along with representing “best-in-class” manufacturers, Classic Control's workforce is comprised of people driven by total customer satisfaction, who are technically strong and conscientious, and who can expertly apply, train, and support Classic Controls products. Classic Controls also offers complete services in both systems integration and valve & actuator repair. Headquartered conveniently in Lakeland Florida, Classic Controls maintains a spacious, modern facility with ample warehousing, machine shop, production area, and QC/testing capabilities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABI LTD

61 Performance Drive, Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA, L4S 0J5
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ABI LTD is a global leader in the manufacturing of baking equipment. For more than 30 years, the company has developed high-calibre technologies for all stages of the baking process; from ingredients handling through to packaging. ABI manufactures stand-alone units for commercial bakeries and provides end-to-end system integrations for many of the world's largest industrial bakeries. The company boasts a network of satisfied customers from across the US, Canada, China, Germany, France, Singapore, South Korea, and the Caribbean.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-controls-inc.jpeg
Classic Controls, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abi-ltd.jpeg
ABI LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Classic Controls, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABI LTD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Classic Controls, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABI LTD in 2025.

Incident History — Classic Controls, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Classic Controls, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABI LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABI LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/classic-controls-inc.jpeg
Classic Controls, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abi-ltd.jpeg
ABI LTD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ABI LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Classic Controls, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ABI LTD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Classic Controls, Inc. company.

In the current year, ABI LTD company and Classic Controls, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABI LTD company nor Classic Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ABI LTD company nor Classic Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ABI LTD company nor Classic Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. company nor ABI LTD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. company nor ABI LTD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ABI LTD company employs more people globally than Classic Controls, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Classic Controls, Inc. nor ABI LTD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H