Comparison Overview

Clarity Child Guidance Center

VS

Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery

Clarity Child Guidance Center

8535 Tom Slick, San Antonio, 78229, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Clarity Child Guidance Center exists to transform the lives of children and families. We are the only nonprofit treatment center in San Antonio and South Texas that specializes in children ages 3-17 who suffer from serious mental health problems. Our inpatient and outpatient programs include a range of services, from crisis stabilization, to psychiatric evaluations, to ongoing therapy. We have the region's largest staff of children's mental health professionals at our three, family friendly campuses and several satellite locations. As a United Way agency, we provide greatly needed mental health care for children who could not otherwise afford to receive treatment. Our mission is to help children, adolescents, and families overcome the disabling effects of mental illness and improve their ability to function successfully at home, at school, and in the community

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery

2104 Cullen Ave, Austin, Texas, 78757, US
Last Update:

In addition to being partners in life as husband and wife Paul and Lola Duffy are passionate about their shared mission to assist others in working through the very difficult thoughts and feelings associated with grief and loss. Paul is a Licensed Professional Counselor and Lola is a Certified Grief Recovery Specialist and Certified Positive Psychology Coach. All major life-transitions include some kind of loss and grief - even sought-after transitions like graduation from college include loss and related grief. Making the most of major life-transitions necessitates effectively processing through the associated losses to overcome the obstacles to successful transition that are generated by loss-related emotion and thought. Our cognitive-behavioral therapeutic counseling and coaching helps people experience healing and wellness as they seek and find new purpose following life's inevitable losses including death of a loved one, divorce and major career change. Beyond those listed above, we can also help with other transitions involving loss and grief, including: couples-conflict, underemployment, long-term disability related transitions, recovery from addictions, relocation-resettlement, unemployment or underemployment following college graduation. Personal Learning and Development is registered in Texas as a nonprofit charitable entity founded to offer grief support group facilitation either pro bono or as in-kind contributions, through churches and other non-profit organizations. Additional information about Paul and Lola’s professional background and training can be found at our “About Us” page at http://personallearninganddevelopment.org/about_us .

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clarity-child-guidance-center.jpeg
Clarity Child Guidance Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/personal-learning-and-development.jpeg
Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clarity Child Guidance Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clarity Child Guidance Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery in 2026.

Incident History — Clarity Child Guidance Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clarity Child Guidance Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clarity-child-guidance-center.jpeg
Clarity Child Guidance Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/personal-learning-and-development.jpeg
Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clarity Child Guidance Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clarity Child Guidance Center company.

In the current year, Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company and Clarity Child Guidance Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company nor Clarity Child Guidance Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company nor Clarity Child Guidance Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company nor Clarity Child Guidance Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center company nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center company nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clarity Child Guidance Center company employs more people globally than Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clarity Child Guidance Center nor Personal Learning and Development for Grief Recovery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N