Comparison Overview

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art

VS

Centre Pompidou

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art

200 W First St, Claremont, CA, 91711, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://clmoa.org

The Claremont Lewis Museum of Art, located in the historic Claremont Depot, is a jewel of a small art museum that celebrates the community’s rich artistic legacy and promotes the cultural vitality of the region. The Museum promotes the arts in Claremont and the region through its exhibitions and events and provides art education programs for Claremont schools. Centered by the Colleges, Claremont emerged as an important art community in the years following World War II under the leadership of Millard Sheets. Artists are integral to the cultural fabric of the City, having contributed to its unique identity and personality for more than 70 years. In the tradition of their predecessors, local artists continue to impact the quality of the social and built environments.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Centre Pompidou

Place Georges Pompidou, PARIS, undefined, 75004, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centrepompidou.fr/

Boasting iconic architecture designed by Renzo Piano and Richard Rogers, the Centre Pompidou was inaugurated in 1977. In a single building, it houses one of the world's top museums, containing Europe's leading collection of modern and contemporary art, as well as cinemas, theatres, educational activity areas and a research library for 20th and 21st century art. It also has partnerships with a public reading library and a music research institute (IRCAM). As a platform creating links between society and contemporary creation, the Centre Pompidou is a place for the people. It welcomes over 3 million visitors each year, and its mission is to reach out to an ever-broader public, offering them the means to explore the most recent and active contemporary creation by establishing close relations with artists.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 989
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claremont-museum-of-art.jpeg
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-pompidou.jpeg
Centre Pompidou
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centre Pompidou
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claremont Lewis Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre Pompidou in 2026.

Incident History — Claremont Lewis Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centre Pompidou (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre Pompidou cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claremont-museum-of-art.jpeg
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-pompidou.jpeg
Centre Pompidou
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Centre Pompidou company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Centre Pompidou company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Centre Pompidou company and Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Centre Pompidou company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Centre Pompidou company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centre Pompidou company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor Centre Pompidou company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centre Pompidou company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company.

Centre Pompidou company employs more people globally than Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art nor Centre Pompidou holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References