Comparison Overview

CE PHOTO

VS

Studio C Photography

CE PHOTO

Wrotham, Sevenoaks, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Since its establishment in 2011, CE Photo has covered a broad range of sporting activities and has captured the best from more than 250,000 holiday makers across its European branches. CE Photo service also offers family portraiture and camera workshops. If you are visiting a Neilson Holiday resort then book in advance for a private photoshoot and you won’t be disappointed. More than 5 million photos are taken across resorts in which we operate each Summer and made available to guests who wish to have a memento that captures the spirit and energy of their holiday. In its endeavour to invest in its skilled photography teams, CE Photo has a renowned reputation for developing ambitious and talented photographers.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio C Photography

Culpeper, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

Our company is based and founded on the principle of memories and the photographic art. The time to enjoy our memories are in the present and the future. When we look back on the special occasions of our lives, quite often that is done through the photography on our walls and in our albums. In those moments, I believe, I am helping you relive those memories and special occasions. The memories are alive! We experience and share those people, events, and feelings with new generations to enjoy.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clare-edmead-photography-limited.jpeg
CE PHOTO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-c-photography.jpeg
Studio C Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CE PHOTO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio C Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CE PHOTO in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio C Photography in 2025.

Incident History — CE PHOTO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CE PHOTO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio C Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio C Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clare-edmead-photography-limited.jpeg
CE PHOTO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-c-photography.jpeg
Studio C Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio C Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CE PHOTO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio C Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CE PHOTO company.

In the current year, Studio C Photography company and CE PHOTO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio C Photography company nor CE PHOTO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio C Photography company nor CE PHOTO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio C Photography company nor CE PHOTO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CE PHOTO company nor Studio C Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CE PHOTO company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Studio C Photography company.

CE PHOTO company employs more people globally than Studio C Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CE PHOTO nor Studio C Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N