Comparison Overview

Claranet

VS

DXC Technology

Claranet

110 High Holborn, London, England, WC1V 6JS, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Claranet modernise and run critical applications and infrastructure. We simplify the management of IT services so our customers can concentrate on what they do best. By working with us our customers gain access to a wide range of managed services, professional services, and training across Cloud, Networks, Managed Cyber Security, and Workplace communication and collaboration technologies. Founded in 1996, Claranet has evolved from a pioneering ISP (Internet Service Provider) into a leading technology services provider with global reach. The company has annualised revenues of circa ยฃ440 / โ‚ฌ600 / $600 million, over 10,000 customers, and more than 3,000 employees. This international success is driven by local service, out of local offices, using a mixture of local and international infrastructure, including public clouds. Claranet was positioned for the second year running in Gartnerโ€™s Magic Quadrant for Data Centre Outsourcing and Hybrid Infrastructure Managed Services, Europe, introduced in 2018. This follows Claranetโ€™s inclusion as a โ€˜Leaderโ€™ in the Magic Quadrant for Managed Hybrid Cloud Hosting, Europe for five years running, 2013-2017. The company is also the only technology provider in the UK to appear as a Leader across ISG Provider Lensโ„ข reports for both public cloud and cyber security. For more information visit www.claranet.co.uk

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 2,966
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DXC Technology

20408 Bashan Dr, Ashburn, Virginia, 20147, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

DXC Technology (NYSE: DXC) helps global companies run their mission-critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. The world's largest companies and public sector organizations trust DXC to deploy services to drive new levels of performance, competitiveness, and customer experience across their IT estates. Learn more about how we deliver excellence for our customers and colleagues: https://www.dxc.com X: https://x.com/DXCTechnology Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/DXCTechnology Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dxctechnology

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 87,942
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claranet.jpeg
Claranet
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxctechnology.jpeg
DXC Technology
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Claranet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DXC Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claranet in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DXC Technology in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Claranet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claranet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” DXC Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DXC Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claranet.jpeg
Claranet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxctechnology.jpeg
DXC Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Claranet company and DXC Technology company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, DXC Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Claranet company.

In the current year, DXC Technology company and Claranet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DXC Technology company nor Claranet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DXC Technology company nor Claranet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DXC Technology company nor Claranet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Claranet company nor DXC Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Claranet company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DXC Technology company.

DXC Technology company employs more people globally than Claranet company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X