Comparison Overview

Clara Martin Center

VS

NAMI Broward County

Clara Martin Center

11 North Main Street, Randolph, Vermont 05060-1330, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://claramartin.org

Clara Martin Center is Vermont’s only Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC). Based in Randolph, Clara Martin Center operates 13 sites around Central Vermont, including Bradford and Wilder. CMC serves Orange County and the greater Upper Valley area with mental health and substance use disorder services. We serve clients in schools, hospitals, at home, and in the community. Clara Martin Center is a community based, non-profit organization. We strive to be consumer-sensitive, cost-effective and outcome based. A qualified and caring team of professionals working to provide a comprehensive range of outpatient, person-centered and trauma-informed care services for adults and children with complex needs, while working with providers and community partners for care continuity.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NAMI Broward County

4161 NW 5 St, Suite 203, Plantation, FL, 33317, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.namibroward.org

Approximately one in five adults suffers from a diagnosable mental disorder every year. In Broward County, this means about 450,000 people are living with a mental illness. NAMI Broward’s mission is to bring awareness and programs to Broward County to support a world-class treatment and recovery system for people with mental illness and their families by: • Providing support to persons with serious brain disorders and to their families • Educating families and consumers • Advocating for improved opportunities for housing, rehabilitation, and meaningful jobs • Supporting public education programs designed to help eliminate the pervasive stigma surrounding severe mental illness

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claramartincenter.jpeg
Clara Martin Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-broward-county-inc.jpeg
NAMI Broward County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clara Martin Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAMI Broward County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clara Martin Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAMI Broward County in 2026.

Incident History — Clara Martin Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clara Martin Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAMI Broward County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAMI Broward County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claramartincenter.jpeg
Clara Martin Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-broward-county-inc.jpeg
NAMI Broward County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clara Martin Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAMI Broward County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NAMI Broward County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Clara Martin Center company.

In the current year, NAMI Broward County company and Clara Martin Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NAMI Broward County company nor Clara Martin Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NAMI Broward County company nor Clara Martin Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NAMI Broward County company nor Clara Martin Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clara Martin Center company nor NAMI Broward County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clara Martin Center company nor NAMI Broward County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clara Martin Center company employs more people globally than NAMI Broward County company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clara Martin Center nor NAMI Broward County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References