Comparison Overview

CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd

VS

CK Birla Group

CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd

48/F Cheung Kong Center, 2 Queen's Road Central, None, Hong Kong, None, HK, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CK Hutchison Holdings Limited (CKHH) is a renowned multinational conglomerate committed to innovation and technology. Our diverse businesses employ over 300,000 people in about 50 countries across the world. It is among the largest companies listed on the main board of The Hong Kong Stock Exchange. CKHH has five core businesses - ports and related services, retail, infrastructure, energy and telecommunications.

NAICS: 92111
NAICS Definition: Executive Offices
Employees: 201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CK Birla Group

8th Floor, Birla Tower, New Delhi, New Delhi, 110001, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The CK Birla Group, with a revenue of over USD 3 billion, is an Indian multinational conglomerate. With over 35,000 employees, the group operates 52 manufacturing facilities across India and the world, with a presence in diverse sectors including technology, automotive, home and building, and healthcare. The CK Birla Group continuously adapts to stay ahead in a changing world. By harnessing technology and investing in people and digital transformation, the Group consistently remains agile and delivers profitable growth. Viewing value creation through a global lens, our companies operate without borders. The CK Birla Group companies include Birlasoft Limited, GMMCO Limited, National Engineering Industries Limited (manufacturer of NBC Bearings), Orient Cement Limited, HIL Limited, Orient Electric Limited, CK Birla Healthcare Private Limited (CK Birla Hospitals and Birla Fertility & IVF), Orient Paper & Industries Limited, AVTEC Limited, and Neosym Industry Limited. Our companies share a common purpose of serving customers, partners and communities to create long term value through trust based relationships.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29,641
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ck-hutchison-holdings-ltd.jpeg
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ck-birla-group.jpeg
CK Birla Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CK Birla Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CK Birla Group in 2025.

Incident History — CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CK Birla Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CK Birla Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ck-hutchison-holdings-ltd.jpeg
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ck-birla-group.jpeg
CK Birla Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CK Birla Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CK Birla Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company.

In the current year, CK Birla Group company and CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CK Birla Group company nor CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CK Birla Group company nor CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CK Birla Group company nor CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company nor CK Birla Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CK Birla Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company.

CK Birla Group company employs more people globally than CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Executive Offices.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd nor CK Birla Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H