Comparison Overview

Civil Squared

VS

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

Civil Squared

11301 N. Meridian Street , Carmel, IN, US, 46032
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Our purpose at Civil Squared is to get un-likeminded people talking again because that’s how, together, we’ll create the most effective solutions to the challenges our communities face. Today’s problems won’t be solved by silencing disagreement. Civil discourse is essential to building and maintaining a free and prosperous society. A truly free society requires not just free exchanges of goods and services, but a free exchange of ideas. We envision a time when individuals engage with one another with empathy and intellectual curiosity. People won’t just yell at one another on social media or retreat to their own corners, but they’ll devise innovative solutions to the challenges in their communities as a result of vigorous, respectful, and creative conversations. Our mission is to support the building of a free society by creating spaces for civil conversations among independent thinkers. Reviving civil discourse in America one conversation at a time. Listen to the podcast and sign up for our popular weekly email at CivilSquared.org

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

113 Brattle Street, None, Cambridge, MA, US, 02138
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy seeks to improve quality of life through the effective use, taxation, and stewardship of land. A nonprofit private operating foundation whose origins date to 1946, the Lincoln Institute researches and recommends creative approaches to land as a solution to economic, social, and environmental challenges. Through education, training, publications, and events, we integrate theory and practice to inform public policy decisions worldwide.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/civilsquared.jpeg
Civil Squared
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-institute-of-land-policy.jpeg
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Civil Squared
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Civil Squared in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in 2025.

Incident History — Civil Squared (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Civil Squared cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/civilsquared.jpeg
Civil Squared
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-institute-of-land-policy.jpeg
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Civil Squared company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Civil Squared company.

In the current year, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company and Civil Squared company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company nor Civil Squared company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company nor Civil Squared company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company nor Civil Squared company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Civil Squared company nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Civil Squared company nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company employs more people globally than Civil Squared company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Civil Squared nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X