Comparison Overview

CityBlue Technologies

VS

The Watermark Group

CityBlue Technologies

404 SW Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois, 61602, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

CityBlue Technologies is an industry leader in providing Large Format Printing Equipment, Drone Services, Digital Platform Solutions and a wide range of products and services for the Architectural, Engineering, Industrial, Power, Manufacturing and Government Markets. CityBlue Technologies is considered one of the most well-rounded solutions for the architectural, engineering, and manufacturing industries. By providing top-of-the-line CAD Products and Supplies, CityBlue Technologies is tough to beat. Our CAD Products consist of our own private label product line along with Oce paper and toner products, RSA (Reprographic Services Association) paper products, HP (Hewlett Packard) inks and papers, as well as all of your Canon ink needs. These high quality products help deliver the total solution. More information is available on our website at https://www.citybluetechnologies.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Watermark Group

4271 Gate Crest, San Antonio, TX, 78217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We cater to the needs of innovative companies that require excellent quality and service for their printing and mailing solutions. From tactical marketing to brand continuity, our clients trust us to efficiently manage their brand and corporate printing needs. Recognized as highly affordable and functional representatives of their company, clients relish the time we return to their workday and budgetary savings. As innovators we continually research new printing methods and technologies to benefit our clients and their brands. Cohesive teams of experts are the foundation of our many long lasting relationships as a preferred business partner. Working with you, your internal design team or external agency, we provide the resources and innovation to help you achieve your business goals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cityblue-technologies.jpeg
CityBlue Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-watermark-group.jpeg
The Watermark Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CityBlue Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Watermark Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CityBlue Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Watermark Group in 2025.

Incident History — CityBlue Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CityBlue Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Watermark Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Watermark Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cityblue-technologies.jpeg
CityBlue Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-watermark-group.jpeg
The Watermark Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CityBlue Technologies company and The Watermark Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Watermark Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CityBlue Technologies company.

In the current year, The Watermark Group company and CityBlue Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Watermark Group company nor CityBlue Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Watermark Group company nor CityBlue Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Watermark Group company nor CityBlue Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CityBlue Technologies company nor The Watermark Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Watermark Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CityBlue Technologies company.

The Watermark Group company employs more people globally than CityBlue Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CityBlue Technologies nor The Watermark Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N