Comparison Overview

City of Sequim, WA

VS

City of Philadelphia

City of Sequim, WA

152 W Cedar St, Sequim, 98382, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sequimwa.gov/

Surrounded by natural beauty and full of small-town charm, Sequim is a popular destination for outdoor enthusiasts and lavender lovers and is one of the driest places in western Washington. An active arts community, vibrant downtown, and diverse culinary options make Sequim the cultural and commercial heart of the Sequim-Dungeness Valley on the magnificent Olympic Peninsula.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

City of Philadelphia

City Hall, Philadelphia, 19102, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 650 and 699
http://www.phila.gov

With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accountability, collaboration, diversity and inclusion. We strive to effectively deliver services, to resolve the challenges facing our city, and to make Philadelphia a place where all of our residents have the opportunity to reach their potential. To learn more about job opportunities, visit www.phila.gov or follow #PHLCityJobs.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,720
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-philadelphia.jpeg
City of Philadelphia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Sequim, WA
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Philadelphia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Sequim, WA in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Philadelphia in 2026.

Incident History — City of Sequim, WA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Sequim, WA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-sequim-wa.jpeg
City of Sequim, WA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-philadelphia.jpeg
City of Philadelphia
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cyberattack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

City of Sequim, WA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Philadelphia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Philadelphia company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Sequim, WA company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Philadelphia company and City of Sequim, WA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Philadelphia company nor City of Sequim, WA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

City of Philadelphia company has disclosed at least one data breach, while City of Sequim, WA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Philadelphia company nor City of Sequim, WA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Sequim, WA company nor City of Philadelphia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Philadelphia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Sequim, WA company.

City of Philadelphia company employs more people globally than City of Sequim, WA company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Sequim, WA nor City of Philadelphia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References