Comparison Overview

City of Port Phillip

VS

Government of Western Australia

City of Port Phillip

99a Carlisle Street, St Kilda, Victoria, 3182, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au

The City of Port Phillip was formed in 1994 and is an amalgamation of the former cities of Port Melbourne, South Melbourne and St Kilda. We are an inner city council in Melbourne that includes the following neighbourhoods; St Kilda, Elwood, South Melbourne, Windsor, Ripponlea, Balaclava, St Kilda East, Port Melbourne, Albert Park, Middle Park. Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of this land, the people of the Kulin Nations. We pay our respect to their Elders, past and present. We acknowledge and uphold their continuing relationship to this land.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 748
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Government of Western Australia

Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wa.gov.au

Welcome to the official WA Government page where you can stay up to date on the latest information about Western Australia and WA government initiatives. Questions relating to a specific activity within the WA Government should be referred to the relevant Department or Minister’s Office for a response. If you have a question about COVID-19, you can call the National Coronavirus Helpline on 1800 020 080 or visit: http://www.wa.gov.au/COVID19. For other information, including WA Government initiatives visit WA.gov.au. The Western Australian public sector is made up of a diverse group of approximately 130 government agencies working to deliver services to the community. You can find the latest employment opportunities in public sector by visiting jobs.wa.gov.au.

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-port-phillip.jpeg
City of Port Phillip
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-western-australia.jpeg
Government of Western Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Port Phillip
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Government of Western Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Port Phillip in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Government of Western Australia in 2025.

Incident History — City of Port Phillip (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Port Phillip cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Government of Western Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government of Western Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-port-phillip.jpeg
City of Port Phillip
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unintentional Data Disclosure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-western-australia.jpeg
Government of Western Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Government of Western Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Port Phillip company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Port Phillip company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Government of Western Australia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Government of Western Australia company and City of Port Phillip company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Government of Western Australia company nor City of Port Phillip company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

City of Port Phillip company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Government of Western Australia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Government of Western Australia company nor City of Port Phillip company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Port Phillip company nor Government of Western Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Port Phillip company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Government of Western Australia company.

Government of Western Australia company employs more people globally than City of Port Phillip company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Port Phillip nor Government of Western Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References