Comparison Overview

City of Mission Viejo

VS

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

City of Mission Viejo

200 Civic Center, Mission Viejo, California, 92691, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

With roughly 100,000 residents, Mission Viejo is a premier South Orange County community featuring a picturesque canvas and attractive, safe neighborhoods that exist in concert with the natural environment. Mission Viejo is rich in culture and has a diverse population that is committed to community involvement and volunteerism. Residents enjoy a superior educational system and a quality of life that is supported by this City’s commercial vitality. The City of Mission Viejo is committed to excellence, innovation and service, combined with sound fiscal management. The City, which embraces its history, heritage and future, takes pride in providing residents with an array of impressive cultural arts and sports programs, community events and activities that truly benefit people of all ages. Find out more at https://cityofmissionviejo.org

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 248
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, US, 30333
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

CDC works 24/7 keeping America safe from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights it and supports communities and citizens to prevent it. CDC is the nation’s health protection agency - saving lives, protecting people from health threats, and saving money through prevention. For more information, please go to: http://www.cdc.gov/ Comment Policy: Please visit http://www.cdc.gov/SocialMedia/Tools/CommentPolicy.html to view CDC’s social media comment policy. Privacy Notice Regarding Third Party Websites: Privacy Notice: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses third-party Web sites to share information and to encourage collaboration with the public. Third-party Web sites are not Government-owned or Government-operated. They are controlled and operated by a third party not affiliated with CDC. The CDC Privacy Policy does not apply to third-party Web sites or applications. To learn more about CDC’s privacy practices, please visit our Privacy Policy at https://www.cdc.gov/other/privacy.html.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 20,033
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-mission-viejo.jpeg
City of Mission Viejo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention.jpeg
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Mission Viejo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Mission Viejo has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2025.

Incident History — City of Mission Viejo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Mission Viejo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-mission-viejo.jpeg
City of Mission Viejo
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention.jpeg
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Mission Viejo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Mission Viejo and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, City of Mission Viejo company has reported more cyber incidents than Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company.

Neither Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company nor City of Mission Viejo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has disclosed at least one data breach, while City of Mission Viejo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

City of Mission Viejo company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Mission Viejo company nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Mission Viejo company.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company employs more people globally than City of Mission Viejo company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Mission Viejo nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X