Comparison Overview

City of Los Angeles

VS

Social Security Administration

City of Los Angeles

200 North Spring St., Los Angeles, 90012, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://linkpages.pro/CityLAJobs

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Council-Commission form of government, as originally adopted by voters of the City of Los Angeles, effective July 1, 1925, and reaffirmed by a new Charter effective July 1, 2000. A Mayor, City Controller, and City Attorney are elected by City residents every four years. Fifteen City Council members representing fifteen districts are elected by the people for four-year terms, for a maximum of two terms. Members of Commissions are generally appointed by the Mayor, subject to the approval of the City Council. General Managers of the various City departments are also appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Most employees of the City are subject to the civil service provisions of the City Charter.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 15,702
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, 21235, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ssa.gov/careers/

Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's history. We are there throughout life’s journey, helping secure today and tomorrow. We are one of the largest independent agencies in government, with over 58,000 team members throughout the country. Our talented workforce includes employees who serve customers directly, as well as those who support their work in diverse fields. Through compassion and dedication, our team members help promote the economic security of the country. They are the heart of our agency, providing high-quality, personalized service to people in their communities, nationwide, and even living abroad. Our workforce is our greatest strength at SSA. We place high priority on developing, engaging, and empowering our team members. Through career development programs, our team members have access to a wide range of training and professional development opportunities. We rely on our team members’ feedback to improve how we administer our programs and to create an environment of trust and cooperation across our organization. We also offer an excellent benefits package to our team members. To learn more about a career with SSA, visit SSA.gov/careers.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 46,616
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Los Angeles
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Social Security Administration
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Los Angeles in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Social Security Administration in 2026.

Incident History — City of Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Social Security Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Security Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ssa.jpeg
Social Security Administration
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Insider Threat, Unauthorized Data Sharing
Motivation: Political interference, Election fraud investigation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

City of Los Angeles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Social Security Administration company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Social Security Administration company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Los Angeles company has not reported any.

In the current year, Social Security Administration company and City of Los Angeles company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Social Security Administration company nor City of Los Angeles company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Social Security Administration company has disclosed at least one data breach, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Social Security Administration company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor Social Security Administration company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Los Angeles company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Social Security Administration company.

Social Security Administration company employs more people globally than City of Los Angeles company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Los Angeles nor Social Security Administration holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References