Comparison Overview

City of Lafayette

VS

City of Framingham

City of Lafayette

20 N. 6th St. , Lafayette, Indiana, 47901, US
Last Update: 2025-12-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lafayette.in.gov

A warm welcome from the City of Lafayette, known as the place of choice for singles, families and retirees. Our community values long-time residents, welcomes newcomers and enjoys visitors. A high-energy community, the Greater Lafayette area is a thriving business and industry hub focused on progress, investment and job creation. We offer great sports and recreation, fine cultural activities, year round festivals and affordable housing. And we're known for our blue-ribbon schools, regional healthcare services and historic downtown loaded with shopping, dining and night life. With a wide-ranging and strong economy, many career and business opportunities abound. Greater Lafayette is home to advanced manufacturers General Electric, Caterpillar, Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc., Wabash National and other top industries, as well as thriving life science companies, from Evonik Degussa Corp. to startups licensing Purdue technologies. Small business, arts and culture and entrepreneurs all contribute to making the area economy strong. Lafayette's city departments, civic leaders and organizations such as Greater Lafayette Commerce stand ready to help our citizens succeed on the job or in business. Greater Lafayette is a well-educated community. We're home to Purdue University, Ivy Tech Community College, three outstanding public school corporations and several private educational systems. You will see in our community a growing, involved population; dynamic public and private sectors with many opportunities; and a quality of life second to none. We invite you to experience our community's hopes and aspirations and share your own as well. New developments in the city and along the Wabash River all point to a bright future for Lafayette, the place of choice.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 271
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

City of Framingham

150 Concord Street Framingham, MA 01702, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.framinghamma.gov

OVERVIEW Framingham was incorporated as a town on June 25, 1700. Chapter 143 of the Acts of 1949 established the Town of Framingham Representative Town Government by Limited Town Meetings. The Citizens of Framingham adopted the Home Rule Charter for the City of Framingham at an election held on April 5, 2017. The benefits of local government outlined in the Home Rule Charter affirm the values of representative democracy, strong leadership, and citizen participation. On November 7, 2017 the citizens of Framingham elected the first Mayor, City Council and School Committee, who were sworn into office on January 1, 2018. EXECUTIVE & LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES The executive and administrative powers of the municipality are solely vested in the Mayor, and may be exercised by the Mayor either personally or through several municipal agencies under the general supervision and control of the Mayor. The Mayor shall enforce the charter, the laws, the ordinances and other orders of the municipality and record all official acts of the executive branch of City government. The Mayor shall exercise general supervision and direction over all municipal agencies, unless otherwise provided by law, by the charter or by ordinance. City Council is the sole legislative body of the City, and is therefore responsible for passing all City ordinances. The City Council is made up of eleven (11) members which shall exercise the legislative powers of Framingham. Two (2) of these members are known as councilors-at-large and nine (9) members are known as district councilors.

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-lafayette-indiana.jpeg
City of Lafayette
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-framingham.jpeg
City of Framingham
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Lafayette
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Framingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Lafayette in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Framingham in 2025.

Incident History — City of Lafayette (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Lafayette cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Framingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Framingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-lafayette-indiana.jpeg
City of Lafayette
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-framingham.jpeg
City of Framingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Framingham company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Lafayette company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Lafayette company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Framingham company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Framingham company and City of Lafayette company have not reported any cyber incidents.

City of Lafayette company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while City of Framingham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Framingham company nor City of Lafayette company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither City of Framingham company nor City of Lafayette company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Lafayette company nor City of Framingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City of Lafayette company nor City of Framingham company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

City of Framingham company employs more people globally than City of Lafayette company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Lafayette nor City of Framingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

In GnuPG through 2.4.8, if a signed message has \f at the end of a plaintext line, an adversary can construct a modified message that places additional text after the signed material, such that signature verification of the modified message succeeds (although an "invalid armor" message is printed during verification). This is related to use of \f as a marker to denote truncation of a long plaintext line.

Published
Date
2025-12-27
Updated
Date
2025-12-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in jackq XCMS up to 3fab5342cc509945a7ce1b8ec39d19f701b89261. Affected is the function Upload of the file Admin/Home/Controller/ProductImageController.class.php of the component Backend. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-27
Updated
Date
2025-12-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1 when using the PDO PostgreSQL driver with PDO::ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES enabled, an invalid character sequence (such as \x99) in a prepared statement parameter may cause the quoting function PQescapeStringConn to return NULL, leading to a null pointer dereference in pdo_parse_params() function. This may lead to crashes (segmentation fault) and affect the availability of the target server.

Published
Date
2025-12-27
Updated
Date
2025-12-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, a heap buffer overflow occurs in array_merge() when the total element count of packed arrays exceeds 32-bit limits or HT_MAX_SIZE, due to an integer overflow in the precomputation of element counts using zend_hash_num_elements(). This may lead to memory corruption or crashes and affect the integrity and availability of the target server.

Published
Date
2025-12-27
Updated
Date
2025-12-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
References
Description

In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, the getimagesize() function may leak uninitialized heap memory into the APPn segments (e.g., APP1) when reading images in multi-chunk mode (such as via php://filter). This occurs due to a bug in php_read_stream_all_chunks() that overwrites the buffer without advancing the pointer, leaving tail bytes uninitialized. This may lead to information disclosure of sensitive heap data and affect the confidentiality of the target server.

Published
Date
2025-12-27
Updated
Date
2025-12-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References