Comparison Overview

City of Killeen, Texas

VS

City of Los Angeles

City of Killeen, Texas

Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.killeentexas.gov

Summary With the adoption of the City Charter in 1949, the council-manager form of government under which the City of Killeen currently operates was established. The mayor is the City’s chief elected officer, but has no administrative power. The mayor presides over the City’s seven member City Council, which sets all policy. The operations of the City are overseen by a city manager appointed by the council. The citizens elect a mayor and three council members at large. The other four council members represent specific districts of the City and are elected by voters living in their districts. Terms for the mayor and all council members are two years, with a three-consecutive-term limitation for each office. The City holds nonpartisan elections each May. The mayor and the at-large council members are elected in even-numbered years, and the four district council members are elected in odd-numbered years. Mission Dedicated Service - Every Day, for Everyone! Description #3 Most Affordable Places to Live (Kiplinger.com) #5 Best Performing City in the Nation (Milken Institute) #5 Strongest Economy in Texas (Policom) #7 Happiest Cities for Work (CareerBliss.com) #8 Strongest Economy in the Nation (Policcom) #19 Best Cities for College Students (American Institute of Economic Research) National Register of Historic Places (National Park Service) GO TEXAN Certified Retirement Community (Texas Department of Agriculture) Playful City USA (KaBOOM!) Tree City USA (Arbor Day Foundation)

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 519
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

City of Los Angeles

200 North Spring St., Los Angeles, California, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://linkpages.pro/CityLAJobs

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Council-Commission form of government, as originally adopted by voters of the City of Los Angeles, effective July 1, 1925, and reaffirmed by a new Charter effective July 1, 2000. A Mayor, City Controller, and City Attorney are elected by City residents every four years. Fifteen City Council members representing fifteen districts are elected by the people for four-year terms, for a maximum of two terms. Members of Commissions are generally appointed by the Mayor, subject to the approval of the City Council. General Managers of the various City departments are also appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Most employees of the City are subject to the civil service provisions of the City Charter.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 15,569
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-killeen-texas.jpeg
City of Killeen, Texas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Killeen, Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Los Angeles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Killeen, Texas in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Los Angeles in 2025.

Incident History — City of Killeen, Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Killeen, Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-killeen-texas.jpeg
City of Killeen, Texas
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Website Defacement
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Los Angeles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Killeen, Texas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Killeen, Texas company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Los Angeles company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Los Angeles company and City of Killeen, Texas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor City of Killeen, Texas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor City of Killeen, Texas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Killeen, Texas company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas company nor City of Los Angeles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Los Angeles company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Killeen, Texas company.

City of Los Angeles company employs more people globally than City of Killeen, Texas company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Killeen, Texas nor City of Los Angeles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References