Comparison Overview

City of Hope

VS

NSW Health

City of Hope

1500 E. Duarte Road, None, Duarte, CA, US, 91010
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cityofhope.org

City of Hope's mission is to deliver the cures of tomorrow to the people who need them today. Founded in 1913, City of Hope has grown into one of the largest cancer research and treatment organizations in the U.S. and one of the leading research centers for diabetes and other life-threatening illnesses. City of Hope research has been the basis for numerous breakthrough cancer medicines, as well as human synthetic insulin and monoclonal antibodies. With an independent, National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center at its core, City of Hope brings a uniquely integrated model to patients spanning cancer care, research and development, academics and training, and innovation initiatives. City of Hope’s growing national system includes its Los Angeles campus, a network of clinical care locations across Southern California, a new cancer center in Orange County, California, and treatment facilities in Atlanta, Chicago and Phoenix. City of Hope’s affiliated group of organizations includes Translational Genomics Research Institute and AccessHope™.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,858
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

NSW Health

1 Reserve Road, None, St. Leonards, New South Wales, AU, 2065
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.health.nsw.gov.au

​​​​​​​With more than 170,000 staff and 228 hospitals, there are millions of ways we are enriching the health of the NSW community every day. In front of a patient, working in a kitchen, developing new treatments, or at a desk, each one of our staff is a vital member of the largest health organisation in Australia. What binds us is our shared passion and commitment to caring for people. We’re empowering staff to work to their full potential and equip people with skills and capabilities to be agile and responsive. ​​​Join the team enriching health in millions of ways every ​day. Find out more: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/careers/Pages/benefits.aspx View our social media community guidelines here: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/social/Pages/community-guidelines

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 22,121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hope.jpeg
City of Hope
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-health.jpeg
NSW Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Hope
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NSW Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Hope in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSW Health in 2025.

Incident History — City of Hope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Hope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NSW Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSW Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hope.jpeg
City of Hope
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-health.jpeg
NSW Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NSW Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Hope company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Hope company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to NSW Health company.

In the current year, NSW Health company and City of Hope company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NSW Health company nor City of Hope company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both NSW Health company and City of Hope company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

City of Hope company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while NSW Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Hope company nor NSW Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Hope company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NSW Health company.

NSW Health company employs more people globally than City of Hope company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Hope nor NSW Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References